Date: 13.10.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 645 #Critics of the sapir-whorf thesis

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Critics of the sapir-whorf thesis

Critics of the sapir-whorf thesis

Oct/Fri/2017 | Uncategorized

The Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis

Critics of the sapir-whorf thesis

Write my essay -
What is the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis? - Blutner

brace advisor resume These are updates from the State Schools, as well as the Collegeboard and critics of the thesis, ACT. Florida Agricultural and shy person essay, Mechanical University. Critics Sapir-whorf? · Largest historically black college in nation. · Colleges of Agriculture, Science Technology, Behavioral Sciences, Environmental Sciences – 1 of 311 “green” colleges. · School of Architecture is in top 25 in nation. · College of Pharmacy – 6 yr. program – 92% pass rate. Paper? · 5 yr. Thesis? MBA Program. · Now have PhD in Physical Therapy. English? · Renovated 2 residence halls. Of The? · #1 producer of African American Physics Majors. · has Veterinarian Technology program. Buy Research Paper Writing Service? · No Summer Bridge Program. · Nov. 5 – Open House. Florida Atlantic University: · 3351freshmen were brought in this year. · new online application. · application can be submitted by smart phone. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis? · decisions will start to roll out on Oct. 1, 2011. · check status online – if deferred, you will be notified by e-mail. · you will only receive a letter if you have been admitted. · scholarships are competitive. · 1 st yr. for College of university application essay, Medicine – 64 med. students will attend – hands-on – 20 students are in a select group through the critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, Wilkes Honors College (2/1/11 deadline, 3.75 unweighted gpa, 1350 SAT R M – guaranteed admission to College of Medicine. · 2 new programs: Bachelor of Urban Design and Bachelor of Public Safety Administration. · has Pre-communications or Pre-Multimedia Program – need 2.5. · scholarships are competitive, and research paper, awarded approx.

3 wks. after admission – they range from of the sapir-whorf thesis, $2,000-$4,000 – the shy person, $2,000 Elite Owl are gone by Jan. – bright students should apply now for scholarship purpose. Sapir-whorf? · you might get phone call from faculty in dissertation, your major. · Honors Program – Honors Info Sessions on Mon.’s and Fri.’s – you must have taken a rigorous curriculum – be serious about education – this is a good option if you are going onto critics thesis graduate or professional school – rigor of curriculum in university dissertation archive, college prepares you for upper-level school – classes are smaller and more writing intensive – students invited to join, but students may apply, as well – automatically get scholarship – there are 90 students in critics, FAU’s Honors College this year, and number is growing. · New stadium opens Oct. 15. Florida Gulf Coast University. Essay? · 2,575 freshmen - 1200 transfer students. · Will enroll 2.850 freshmen for critics class of 2012. · Have Bachelor in Journalism. · School of Nursing. Essay? · there was wait list for housing in 2010 and of the thesis, 2011– as soon as you submit application, apply for housing. · Div. 1 athletics. · Rolling admissions – Feb. 15 priority deadline. · Fax or mail fee waiver. · Follow your status online. · No different criteria to get in between summer and fall. · Feb. 15, 2011 is shy person essay, priority application and critics thesis, merit scholarship deadline - · Dec.

1 is deadline for scholarships. · Summer Bridge Program for students at risk for math – invitation only – take 75 -100 freshmen. Florida International University. · FIU is in essay on personal statement, growth mode for critics sapir-whorf the next 10 years. · admitted 25% more students. · have new on-line tool – MyMajorMatch – will help select appropriate majors for careers, has salaries, etc. · application online has been delayed – if you haven’t applied yet, make sure you apply on 2011-2012 application – if you have already applied, FIU will contact you. · If you apply by Dec. 1, you will have your decision Jan. 16. · If you apply by Feb. 1, you will have your decision March 16 – after Feb.

1, your decision is on a rolling basis. Research Paper? · There is no paper application. · top public institution for critics sapir-whorf thesis students graduating with least amount of debt. · you can only apply for research paper fall – if you don’t get in for fall, they will look at you for summer and sapir-whorf thesis, spring – · no Summer Bridge Program. Florida State University. Research Paper? · Enrolled 6150 in freshman class (may reduce enrollment for 2012 by 10%) – approx. 6000 planned for 2012. · If you’re in the middle of the critics of the, matrix, you should be OK for admissions for Oct. deadline. · Application is in 2 parts – 2 nd part is the essay, resume, residency – once you do the 1 st part, it goes to essay on personal statement, FSU. · ACT writing mandatory. · Minimum sub-scores for sapir-whorf thesis your application to be looked at (however, the minimums won’t get you admitted): o SAT – 500 verbal, 500 math, 500 writing. o ACT – 21 English, 21 Math, 22 Reading, 22 Writing. · check your application status online. · If apply by Oct. 17, will have decision Dec.

14. · Care decisions will come out Dec. 14 – after that it will be on rolling basis. · Get in on 1 st deadline – standards increase for 2 nd deadline. Essay? · Liberal arts math counts as a math if you took it in 9 th or 10 th grades – next year, it will not count as a math credit. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis? · DO NOT send letters of rec. for the regular application or for CARE – FOLLOW DIRECTIONS! · Summer Bridge Program - CARE : Approx. Essay? 350 students who are lacking in one subject matter and are first generation college students, low income–students are mentored throughout their 4 years; application online; 2.8 recalculated gpa minimum; approx. 350 freshmen accepted for this program. · Honors Program by invitation only. · will ask to see mid-year grades. · 1 st deadline is Oct. 17, 2010 – last SAT/ACT you can take is Nov. test (only if you have tested before, and you have sent your scores to FSU) · Film School is expanding – working with Digital Domain in West Palm Beach – new animation program – 100 spaces open. · You will receive e-mails at midterms and finals – keep in touch. · If you have a D or C, FSU will most definitely look at your final grades. Critics Sapir-whorf Thesis? · If you have a D or F, you are subject to having your admissions rescinded. · If you have less than 2.0 in Dual Enrollment Classes, you are automatically rescinded – there s no appeals process. · Strength of ks3, schedule counts – don’t drop classes. Sapir-whorf Thesis? · all undergraduate school – no upper levels. · liberal arts college; humanities, social science, natural science. · deadline is Nov. 1, but will take applications through March. · every admitted students gets small scholarship. Research Paper? · work with faculty advisor. · written evaluations instead of grades. · #2 best value Princeton Review. Critics Of The Thesis? · 8 Fulbright scholarships awarded. · strong connection between faculty and students. · lot of application essay, volunteer work included in critics of the sapir-whorf, program. · Close to beaches. · Sr.

Thesis – final culmination. · 80% of on personal statement, students go to upper level school. Of The? · 99% of faculty have their terminal degrees. · use Common Application. University of Central Florida. · 58,000 students, 1 st largest university in Florida; 2 nd largest university in the United States. · 74 National Merit Scholars. · College of Medicine. · 6.330 freshmen enrolled for summer and english papers ks3, fall – (3,750 fall, 2,580 summer)– · Will take 6,300-6,400 for of the sapir-whorf 2012. Dissertation Archive? · New Career Services. · New Recreation Center. · 4 Div. Of The? 1 teams this year. Essay? · Check out Lead Scholar’s and Excel Programs. · Have Bachelor in Latin American studies. · If accepted, will receive letter – otherwise, will not receive letter. · not accepting paper applications.

· Check status of your application. · Summer Bridge Program – invitation only – UCF starts looking at applications for of the this in spring; must have strong gpa (3.0 recalculated), but test scores can be lower than you need for regular admissions. · took 6400 freshmen for essay statement summer and fall – took 400 freshmen for sapir-whorf spring. · privacy question – release info – this way, if UF needs to discuss your application with your BRACE Advisor, they can. Shy Person Essay? · UF Innovation Academy – admit in spring – if you are in critics of the sapir-whorf, this academy, you get Bright Futures for summer – there are 32 majors – 16 schools – 1 st group of students they admit will be likeminded and have similar expectations – instead of being “off” during summer term, you are “off” during fall term – that is when you may engage in Innovation activities, internships, work, etc. – DO NOT use this as an admission strategy – it is a different kind of freshman experience. Pitt University? · Summer Bridge Program – remarkable talent or bring something to campus not reflected in application. University of North Florida. · #19 in 2011 Best Value College in US – Forbes. · 75% of critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, classes have 40 or fewer students. · Freshman Experience – live and pitt application, dine on campus – mandatory. · New Flagship programs: Music – Nutrition Dietetics. · Other Flagship programs - Coastal Biology (marine bio), International Business, Muxic, Nursing, Transportation Logistics. · nursing program – 1,300 applicants, 200 admitted. · Oct. 8 – On-site admissions Open House– must have application in by Sept. 23. · Open House – March 24. Critics Of The? · Nov. 1 – On-site admissions at Embassy Suites in Boca Raton – details tba. · Nov.

18 – priority deadline – decision Dec. 16. · Scholarship deadline – Nov. 18. · Summer Bridge Program by invitation only – approx. Edinburgh Dissertation Archive? 36 students. University of South Florida. · Tampa – 3500 freshman slots. · USF Polytechnic – 1 st class fall, 2012. · 39,629 students in Tampa (29310 undergrads, 8583 grads.) · St.

Petersburg campus is smaller and has 19 undergrad. Sapir-whorf Thesis? Majors – teacher/student ratio is 30:1. · College of Marine Science is in St. Shy Person? Pete. · most prevalent majors for USF St. Pete– business, environmental science and policy, psychology, health sciences, entrepreneurship. · 2 new programs: Program health and critics thesis, Pharmacy. · decisions start going out in Oct. · Jan.

2 – priority scholarship deadline. Research Paper? · March 1– priority application deadline. · may receive academic scholarship with admissions. Critics Sapir-whorf? · 2012 – opening new student center. · Provost Scholar’s – come from paper, high school with 18 credits, 3.8 gpa, 1200 SAT R M, 27 ACT – 3 yr. Critics Of The? Bachelor’s Program (including scholarship to study abroad – also 7 yr. Bachelor’s MD Program USF has Academic Success Factors – go to or ask your BRACE Advisor for archive information – you get extra points for having more math (pre-calculus or higher), more science, more language, 3 or more AP classes (in high school), and 2 or more Dual Enrollment classes (in high school) · for critics nursing, you need solid B to edinburgh dissertation, B- recalculated gpa and 3.65-3.7 gpa in 1 st yr. · Summer Bridge Program open for 1 st generation, low income students – 950 summer conditional admits; for program, there are 3 classes required and mandatory attendance. University of Western Florida. · Most prevalent majors – marine biology, business, archaeology. · #27 in top buys for higher education – Forbes. · 1,463 freshmen – up by sapir-whorf thesis 17% · 37:1 average student/teacher ratio. · 83% of classes hold 60 or less students. · New Health Wellness Center. · new residence hall opening 2012. · basketball - won National Championship. · priority deadlines – Jan. 1 for applications and scholarships. Research Paper? · financial aid deadline – March 15. · campus tours on demand – will have tours 1 st Sat. of each month. · Oct. 5 and Nov. 19 – Open House. · Fall Information Workshop on thesis Oct.

24 at 6:30 pm – Marriott Ft. Lauderdale – on-site admissions. · PACE Scholarship – have to apply - $20,000 + $4,000 stipend. · 20 minutes to beach. · on nature preserve. · most prevalent majors: business, communications, engineering psychology, marine biology. · will do more comprehensive review this year- if weak in essay, 1 area on test, will work with students during the year (this is critics sapir-whorf thesis, what you need to get in) · go to Open House – greater experience than just campus tour. · In fall, they have full orientation; not a full orientation for summer term. · No Summer Bridge Program. Minimum State Subscores. If you have a 3.0 recalculated gpa, you need to have Department of papers, Education minimums for tests in critics sapir-whorf thesis, order for a state school to look at you: SAT: 440 Reading, 440 Math, 440 Writing. Paper Writing? ACT: 17 English, 18 Reading, 19 Math.

If you have a 2.5-2.99 recalculated gpa, you need to critics of the, have Department of Education minimums for tests in order for a state school to look at you: SAT: 460 Reading, 460 Math, 440 Writing. ACT: 19 reading, 19 Math, 18 English, 18 Writing. What College is the Right Fit For You? Make sure you go on essay on personal campus visits, talk to critics sapir-whorf thesis, recruiters, work with your BRACE Advisor and Guidance Counselor.

Make sure the school you choose is an academic, programmatic, and ks3, social fit. Why Should I Apply Early? Apply everywhere you are considering early for consideration for admissions and scholarships. Don’t drop AP classes! Your course selection is part of critics of the, your application assessment. On Personal Statement? Bright Futures will not pay out if you are classified as a non-resident. You have to have your final transcript sent to the school you will be attending before you graduate. You cannot start at a school without a final transcript. Virtual Counselor doesn’t always end up on transcript. Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis? Make sure the college receives your Dual Enrollment Transcript.

How Many Colleges Should Students Apply To? Apply to more than 1 school. Edinburgh Dissertation? You should apply to 4-6 schools. Critics Of The Thesis? Make sure you have “reach” schools and “safety schools.” The early bird catches the scholarship money! Make sure that you go online and dissertation archive, check the status of your admissions application. Of The Thesis? Between UF, FSU, and UCF, they rescinded 150 decisions in edinburgh dissertation, 2010. If your Dual Enrollment gpa falls, you may get rescinded. This can affect your college gpa. · UF – College of Business has a lot of online classes. Most other departments do have online version of of the thesis, live class (if you can get into it). · FSU and UNF – Don’t have a lot of online classes. · NCF – No online classes. Essay? · USF – 20% of classes across the critics sapir-whorf thesis, board are online. · UCF and FIU – Have fair number of online classes. · UWF – Has some overflow online classes for general studies. · FAU – Has a lot of College of Business and College of archive, Nursing classes online. A.A. to State University System (as Freshman)

You need to know your major, and what prerequisites you need in order to sapir-whorf thesis, get into the department of your choice. Get involved on campus. Make sure you go to Transfer Orientation. If you are an on personal statement undocumented student, you MUST tell the schools. You can get accepted as out-of-state student. DO NOT apply as international student. Students with Disabilities. Critics Thesis? Submit pertinent documentation.

Contact the disabilities office at each college for information. Some of them you have to self-disclose your disability. Some, if you are deferred or denied, you can appeal the edinburgh dissertation, decision using your documentation. · There is a correlation between your SAT score and your grades in college. · 10 sections + 25 min. Critics Of The Thesis? essay. · test takes 3 hrs., 45 minutes, not including 5 3-minute breaks. · be familiar with questions. On Personal? · should take test spring of junior year and fall of senior year. · taking SAT more than twice doesn’t usually result in of the thesis, significant score gains. · rigorous coursework is best to be ready for dissertation SAT. · short-term cramming doesn’t result in critics of the thesis, significant score gains. · there is correlation between AP exam scores and SAT scores. · on SAT registration application, put yes for Student Search Services in order to receive information from colleges and essay on personal, scholarship opportunities. · reading passages are shorter this year. · check out MyCollege Quickstart and critics, MySATSkillsInsight. · Average FL composite – 19.6. English Papers Ks3? · 17 of 20 students who received 36 on test were from critics thesis, public schools. · FL average writing score is 7.2 – National is 7.1. · Average English/Writing is 20.4. · test is 3 hrs., 25 min., including 30 min. Pitt University? writing test. Early Decision versus Early Action. Apply Early Decision ONLY if you are 100% certain you want to attend the school you are applying to. Early Decision is a financially ethically binding application usually requiring a signature on a contract as part of the application package.

You will find out in December/January of your senior year the of the, status of your application. If you are accepted, you must contact all other institutions to which you have applied and withdraw your applications. You may only apply Early Decision to one school . If you are deferred, then you are released from the contract and should continue your applications to other schools so please be prepared. Pros: You let a school know that they're your first choice. You find out buy research paper service if you are accepted sooner. Cons: You will be unable to compare financial aid offers from other schools. This is non-binding . You will learn in December/ January of your senior year the status of your application.

You may apply to more than one school as an Early Action candidate unless otherwise stipulated and are not bound to that school if accepted. Pros: Great opportunity to learn the critics, status of your application early, can compare financial offers from other schools. Single Choice Early Action. This is also non-binding. You MAY NOT apply to any other schools during the early-action period only. You will learn the status of your application in mid-December. Once you receive your decision in english papers ks3, mid-December you free to critics, apply elsewhere, if you choose.

Pros: Great opportunity to learn the status of your application early.

Write My Research Paper for Me -
Test 2 Soc RJ Flashcards | Quizlet

obama hecklers Our great prophecies are contingencies. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. The way our greatest U.S. prophet, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., put our common future in the nuclear age was: The choice today is no longer between violence and nonviolence. It is either nonviolence or nonexistence. King's prophecy applies to all of humankind as we decide whether to exterminate ourselves.

His prophetic contingency, our turning collectively toward nonviolence or nonexistence, applies especially to the citizens of the paper service, planet's most powerful country, the United States of of the America, and particularly to the citizen we elect to preside over our government: the president. John F. Kennedy was in the same dire position every U.S. president has been in since World War II. As president, Kennedy was under the control of what his predecessor, Dwight D. Eisenhower, identified in pitt university application his Farewell Address as the critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, military-industrial complex. [Its] total influence -- economic, political, even spiritual, Eisenhower said, is felt in every city, every state house, every office of the federal government. The military-industrial complex, more powerful today than ever, imprisons the president. English. A U.S. president is critics thesis, always accompanied by a military attaché bearing a nuclear code that can incinerate the earth. That gun to the world is a gun to the president. When he accepts the power to kill everyone, the president becomes a prisoner morally and politically to the demands of our national security state. Whether his name is Dwight D. Pitt Application Essay. Eisenhower, John F. Sapir-whorf. Kennedy, or Barack Obama, once he accepts nuclear power over the world, his permissible movement as president is confined to a very tight space -- tighter than we as citizens might imagine. How Kennedy Rebelled Against the Pentagon and CIA. President Kennedy rebelled against the economic, political, even spiritual influence that President Eisenhower described. On Personal Statement. During JFK's two years and ten months in power, while that power pressured him relentlessly, he compromised with it to survive a few months but in the end stood his ground and critics sapir-whorf thesis took the bullets.

In fact both he and application essay his enemies saw the writing on the wall as early as the abortive Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba, in the first spring of his short presidency. The CIA lied to Kennedy about the political and geographic conditions that premised his approval of the agency's Cuban exile brigade landing at the Bay of critics of the sapir-whorf thesis Pigs. He realized afterward he had been set up -- he had to either send U.S. Essay. combat troops into Cuba to critics sapir-whorf thesis, supersede the CIA's futile exile brigade (as he said in advance he would never do) or accept a huge defeat. After the revealing CIA documents were declassified, the way National Public Radio commentator Daniel Schorr put it was: In effect, President Kennedy was the target of university application essay a CIA covert operation that collapsed when the invasion collapsed. JFK swallowed defeat instead of committing U.S. troops; in recognition of the CIA's trap, he said he wanted to splinter the CIA in sapir-whorf a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds. The Bay of Pigs enabled Kennedy to see the edinburgh archive, cloaked demands of the CIA and the Pentagon as a usurpation of his power as president. He began to break free from his military and intelligence commanders. Prisoners get shot for doing that. Of The. JFK's decision to fire CIA Director Allen Dulles and pitt university application his deputies in the wake of the Bay of Pigs was his first step toward freedom, meaning also death.

He was asserting a presidential control that Eisenhower never did over Allen Dulles and his brother, Secretary of of the sapir-whorf thesis State John Foster Dulles. The Dulles brothers were career Wall Street lawyers who dominated Eisenhower and buy research service served the military-industrial interests that he warned against. It was a warning Ike gave only when it was too late for him to shake those interests off. He left that chore to the next president. When JFK bowled over kingpin Allen Dulles (who would return to power as the most influential member of the Warren Commission), the upstart president was acting as if he -- not his military and intelligence commanders -- were in charge. Kennedy was shocked by sapir-whorf the CIA's scheming against him at the Bay of english ks3 Pigs, and the CIA was shocked by Kennedy's removal of critics sapir-whorf thesis Dulles.

Who did he think he was? How Kennedy Took On the Steel Industry. The steel crisis was JFK's second step toward freedom. On April 10, 1962, U.S. Steel chairman Roger Blough informed President Kennedy that Blough's company was raising steel prices by 3.5 percent -- breaking an agreement to essay, control inflation that the president had just brokered between U.S. Steel and the United Steelworkers.

U.S. Steel was joined publicly in the price hike by five other companies already in collusion with it. JFK was furious at being double-crossed. Thesis. He said to his staff, in a sentence Wall Street would not forget: My father always told me that all businessmen were sons of bitches, but I never believed it until now. President Kennedy and Attorney General Robert Kennedy launched an all-out domestic war to force the edinburgh university dissertation archive, heads of the six colluding companies to cancel their price increase.

The Justice Department raided Big Steel's corporate offices. Robert Kennedy subpoenaed the steel executives' personal and company records. Sapir-whorf Thesis. The Kennedys were going for broke. Most ominously for Big Steel, the president ordered the Defense Department to market its steel business overseas, so as to take huge profits out of the hands of U.S. Steel and its cohorts, at the heart of the military-industrial complex. Faced by the fact that the Kennedys meant business -- their business -- the steel heads surrendered quickly, rescinding their price raise. However, they accomplished a more sinister purpose. A Fortune magazine editorial stated with an insider's knowledge that U.S. Essay. Steel's decision to raise prices, made by a board of critics of the sapir-whorf directors composed of the financial elite of the country, was designed to present the president with a dilemma: either accept the price hike and lose credibility or push back and shy person unite the business world against him, as he did. Fortune publisher Henry Luce, the most powerful media magnate in the world, was behind the editorial.

Drawing on Shakespeare's prediction by the soothsayer of Julius Caesar's assassination, Beware the ides of March, the Luce editorial's title warned Kennedy of the critics thesis, fate he was tempting by his stand against imperial power: Steel: The Ides of essay on personal April. The powers that be had to sapir-whorf thesis, be more than a little angry to be threatening the president so boldly. An American parable was in the making. As Kennedy turned heretically toward peace after the writing, Cuban Missile Crisis, the sapir-whorf thesis, parable of the president and the powers would be played out until it climaxed a year later on essay, a sunny street in Dallas. Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. Then it would be up to us to open our ears and hear.

Dorothy Day's Take on Kennedy's Character. I am a Catholic Worker. I am deeply skeptical of the power of kings and presidents -- all of buy research writing them. But what I also learned from Dorothy Day, mother of the of the thesis, Catholic Worker movement, was a belief in the goodness of every human being. Research Paper. Dorothy had that belief in John Kennedy. She told me pointedly, after JFK's death, to study his life. I didn't know that she and Kennedy had met. Young Jack Kennedy and his older brother Joe, who would die in World War II, visited the Mott Street Catholic Worker in Manhattan one day in the summer of 1940.

Catholic Worker Stanley Vishnewski recalled the critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, incident in an interview with Bill Moyers: I remember distinctly how bewildered [John Kennedy] was by the sight of the poverty and the misery of the place. And then Dorothy came in. She talked to him. Research Paper. Then Dorothy says, Come and have supper with us. And Kennedy looked at her, a little startled, and says, No, come out and have dinner with us instead. So Dorothy, and Joe and critics John Kennedy . On Personal. we went out to a little restaurant around the corner. We had a wonderful conversation. They talked long into critics thesis the night of war and peace and of man and the state, as Dorothy wrote in her book, Loaves and Fishes . Even when Dorothy Day was marching and speaking out decades later against JFK's Cold War policies, something about him struck the chord of her belief in human goodness. So she said after he was killed: Pay attention.

Learn more about his life. Paper Writing Service. It took me over thirty years to follow her recommendation. Yes, we can learn more from critics of the sapir-whorf thesis his life . and his death. Kennedy and research paper Krushchev Ally Against Their Own Militaries. In the critics thesis, Cuban Missile Crisis, President Kennedy had to confront the unspeakable in the form of total nuclear war. At the height of the terrifying conflict that his own anti-Castro policies had helped precipitate, he felt the on personal, situation spiraling out of control, especially because of pressures and provocations by the Pentagon led by General Curtis LeMay.

At a moment when the world was falling into darkness, Kennedy did what his generals thought was unforgivable: he not only rejected their pressures for attacking Cuba and the Soviet Union, but even worse, the president also reached out to the enemy for help. Of The Thesis. That could be considered treason. Soviet Premier Nikita Khrushchev saw it as hope. Buy Research. Robert Kennedy had met secretly with Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin in Washington, warning that the president was losing control to his generals and needed the Soviets' help. When Khrushchev received Kennedy's plea for help in critics of the sapir-whorf Moscow, he turned to his foreign minister, Andrei Gromyko, and said, We have to edinburgh university dissertation, let Kennedy know that we want to help him. Khrushchev hesitated when he heard himself say help. Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. Just when the university archive, U.S. president seemed to be at his wit's end, did he, Khrushchev, really want to help his enemy? Yes, he did. Critics Sapir-whorf Thesis. He repeated the word help to research paper, his foreign minister: Yes, help. We now have a common cause, to save the thesis, world from english ks3 those pushing us toward war. How can we understand that moment?

The two most heavily armed leaders in history, on the verge of total nuclear war, suddenly joined hands against those on critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, both sides pressuring them to attack. Khrushchev ordered the immediate withdrawal of his missiles, in english return for thesis, Kennedy's public pledge never to invade Cuba and his secret promise to withdraw U.S. missiles from Turkey -- as he would in fact do. The two Cold War enemies had turned, so that each now had more in common with his opponent than either had with his own generals. Neither John Kennedy nor Nikita Khrushchev was a saint. Each was deeply complicit in policies that brought humankind to the brink of nuclear war.

Yet, when they encountered the void, they turned to each other for help. In doing so, they turned humanity toward the hope of buy research paper writing a peaceful planet. Kennedy kept walking in that direction, as did Khrushchev. JFK gave his greatest speech on June 10, 1963, at American University. In it he envisioned an end to the Cold War, saying he was stopping atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons and we will not be the first to resume. He said he wanted to negotiate a test ban treaty with the critics, Soviets as soon as possible in Moscow (a less hostile context for negotiations with the enemy than the president's own Washington). His long-range goal, he said, was general and pitt complete disarmament -- designed to take place by stages, permitting parallel political developments to build the new institutions of peace which would take the place of arms. Khrushchev responded in the same spirit. In an astonishing six weeks, the two leaders agreed to the Partial Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. Kennedy said, however, that getting Senate ratification would be almost in the nature of a miracle.

The president convened peace activists, business leaders, women's magazine editors, union activists, scientists, and critics of the sapir-whorf religious leaders in a White House council to on personal statement, organize massive citizen support for the treaty. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. Their grassroots campaign turned public opinion around. University. The Senate passed the Test Ban Treaty by a large majority in September 1963. Also in September, JFK initiated a secret dialogue with Fidel Castro, through U.S./UN diplomat William Attwood, to normalize U.S.-Cuban relations. Kennedy's first back-channel representative in that dialogue, French reporter Jean Daniel, was actually meeting with Castro on the afternoon of November 22, 1963, when they heard the news that, as Castro said, changed everything. Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. The U.S.-Cuban dialogue died in Dallas. On October 11, 1963, JFK had signed National Security Action Memorandum 263. Research Paper. It ordered a U.S. troop withdrawal from Vietnam -- bringing home 1,000 U.S. military personnel by the end of of the sapir-whorf thesis 1963 and by the end of 1965 . the bulk of U.S. personnel, an order that President Johnson quietly voided. The Vietnam War was reignited in Dallas.

President Kennedy's courageous turn from on personal global war to a strategy of peace provides the critics of the thesis, why of his assassination. Edinburgh Dissertation. Because he turned toward peace with our enemies, the Communists, he found himself at odds with his own national security state. Peacemaking had risen to of the sapir-whorf, the top of his agenda as president. That was not the kind of shy person essay leadership the critics sapir-whorf, CIA, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and the military-industrial complex wanted in the White House. Given the essay on personal statement, Cold War dogmas that gripped those dominant powers, and critics sapir-whorf given Kennedy's turn toward peace, his assassination followed as a matter of pitt university essay course. Given what we know now, there can be little doubt it was an act of state. Just as John Kennedy did, Barack Obama had a Bay of Pigs early in his presidency. He became the target of a covert operation that trapped and compromised him as president. Critics Thesis. In Obama's case, the challenge to his authority as commander-in-chief came not from the CIA but from the Army, and not in Cuba but in Afghanistan. As in Kennedy's case, Obama's response to the entrapment established the research paper, pattern of his presidency, but in a direction opposite to Kennedy's.

Obama has become an obedient servant to of the sapir-whorf thesis, his national security state, and as a result, a source of buy research despair to many of of the sapir-whorf thesis his supporters. The critical background to President Obama's June 2010 firing of General Stanley McChrystal for his outlandish Rolling Stone interview was McChrystal's close relationship to the man Obama named to replace him. The president's newly appointed Afghan commander, David H. Petraeus, was McChrystal's boss and mentor. In September 2009, in a more significant subversion of Obama's authority than the english papers ks3, later interview, McChrystal had been Petraeus's point man in a Pentagon threat of revolt unless the president escalated the Afghan War. Heavily supported by Republican leaders, McChrystal pressured Obama publicly by a series of statements questioning the president's initial resistance to sapir-whorf thesis, the general's recommendation of 40,000 more troops. Research Paper. Petraeus also went public, telling a columnist the critics of the, United States would fail in the war unless the president gave them the troops they needed.

Obama's generals were conducting a media war to force him into a decision they had chosen for him. Essay. As Secretary of State Colin Powell's former top aide, Col. Lawrence Wilkerson, observed, Petraeus and McChrystal have put Obama in a trick bag. As Bob Woodward reported in Obama's Wars , the president was blocked at every turn by critics of the thesis his war cabinet, as he sought alternative troop options and an exit plan from the war. However, the generals wanted their troop surge and an open-ended strategy. They provided no exit plan. You're not really giving me any options, Obama told them. You agreed to go back and on personal work those up.

Instead they kept pressuring him for the same troop increase, under different guises, in a war without end. Sapir-whorf Thesis. It's unacceptable, he said. Obama told civilian advisers that the military heads were really cooking the thing in research paper the direction they wanted. They are not going to give me a choice. The president finally gave them 30,000 more troops, while setting a shaky, condition-based date of next July for critics of the, a beginning withdrawal. The generals claimed victory. Petraeus was pleased.

His counterinsurgency strategy was alive and well. As he let Woodward know, If the pitt university application essay, president had told him at the beginning that it would come out with this strategy and 30,000 troops, Petraeus would have taken it in a second. Moreover, Petraeus said privately, he continued to see no end in sight in Afghanistan: You have to recognize also that I don't think you win this war. I think you keep fighting. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf. This is the kind of fight we're in for the rest of our lives and probably our kids' lives. When Obama replaced McChrystal half a year later by the more subtle, more controlling Petraeus, it was a further submission to research paper, the military authorities that the sapir-whorf thesis, president was elected to command. After JFK was set up by the CIA (with the research paper, Pentagon's support) at the Bay of sapir-whorf thesis Pigs, that new, young president bucked his national security state by essay on personal statement firing his main adversary, Cold-Warrior-in-Chief Allen Dulles. When Obama was set up by critics General Petraeus, General McChrystal, and their colleagues to escalate the war in Afghanistan, our new, young president, after (to his credit) months of deliberation, reluctantly went along. His later insertion of Petraeus as his new Afghan commander put the most likely GOP candidate for president in 2012, General David Petraeus, in writing an ideal running position.

Because Bush's surge of occupying troops in Iraq (under Petraeus) has somehow been judged a win, Obama will be scapegoated with the loss if a proxy government in critics thesis Iraq fails after his troop withdrawal. In August General Petraeus warned, If the U.S. loses [in Afghanistan], there would likely be a bloody civil war followed by a takeover by extremists. He added, If the U.S. succeeds and Afghanistan stabilizes, the shy person, country could become the region's new Silk Road with the potential to extract trillions of dollars worth of minerals. If Petraeus fails in thesis his counterinsurgency war to pacify that new road to essay on personal, corporate profits, he can keep on saying he needed more troops and more time to critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, win there -- preparing the political ground for another Obama loss. Petraeus can then return home for a GOP draft to run for president.

Obama, by surrendering to his generals, has been trapped in on personal the same kind of of the sapir-whorf thesis plotting Kennedy had the insight and courage to resist. Can a Peacemaking President Take On the Pentagon? Barack Obama is a very smart and sometimes courageous man. Why did he submit to his generals by widening a disastrous war? Did he think he could at least use his waning power to improve the domestic state of the union, while hoping he could eventually find a way out of our downward spiral of war in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq? If so, he will finally have to say no, for the sake of us all, to his generals and the powers behind them. They will always want the university application essay, troops to fight more battles for of the thesis, the rest of our lives and probably our kids' lives toward the end of trillions of dollars worth of minerals on a new Silk Road.

Can any president of the pitt university, United States turn toward peace without being threatened, set up, and if necessary (from the standpoint of our national security state), assassinated? Because of of the sapir-whorf our unwillingness to connect the university dissertation archive, dots of Dallas with those of critics thesis Washington, U.S. University Essay. citizens have been unable to raise that post-JFK question to consciousness. In the Washington of Barack Obama, where some speak of of the thesis a president's assassination casually and others deliberately, it is time that we dealt with the question in a serious way. John Kennedy did. From his frequent remarks anticipating his own death, friends said he was obsessed by it.

He seems rather to have seen his death in papers ks3 a remarkably detached way in a time of darkness, accepting his own demise if necessary (from the standpoint of critics sapir-whorf his conscience) as the simple consequence of doing his duty. Once we face the why of Kennedy's assassination, never really mysterious and now a story documented by the mass of files made public by the Assassination Records Review Board, we can deal with an essay, obvious question that has likely passed through the mind of critics of the Barack Obama: can a peacemaking president survive a warmaking state? A conscientious president's survival, and the carrying out of english ks3 peace initiatives against sapir-whorf the grain of his government and corporate power, is entwined with the survival of every human being on shy person, earth. The president's vulnerability, while he tries to turn a massive Washington warship toward peace and disarmament, is an unspeakable fact of our politics. But the other side of the unspeakable is ourselves. Our sense of despair, when we see a president's reluctance to choose what may kill him, raises questions about ourselves. King's Global, Nonviolent Vision. Martin Luther King Jr. said in his last testament, Trumpet of Conscience , a little book published after his death: Can a nonviolent, direct-action movement find application on the international level, to critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, confront economic and political problems? I believe it can. It is clear to me that the next stage of the movement is to become international. King envisioned an international movement of massive, nonviolent civil disobedience, bringing the business of London, Paris, Washington, and Ottawa to on personal statement, a halt until such centers of autocracy addressed the real questions of critics of the sapir-whorf democracy.

He said we needed to shut down our marketplaces by nonviolent action until business as usual was opened up to the needs of us all, beginning with the poorest, most exploited people on earth. The way our greatest prophet addressed the on personal, military-industrial complex was to think and act beyond it. That is why he planned the Poor People's Campaign for critics of the, Washington. He was initiating it in Memphis in April 1968, supporting the shy person, sanitation workers' strike there, when he was shot to death. He wanted all those who had nothing to lose to come together in D.C. Sapir-whorf Thesis. that spring and summer -- however long it would take -- to shut down the essay, government by nonviolent resistance until it agreed to shut down poverty and war. Martin Luther King Jr. was saying that Washington and Wall Street did not have the final say. There was -- and sapir-whorf is -- a world out there, from the heartland of the USA to the heartbeat of the Congo, from those suffering in Appalachia to those struggling in the Amazon. If we are willing to english papers, struggle, suffer, and die together nonviolently, anything is possible for our world.

King's global, nonviolent vision is waiting to be realized if we're willing to carry it out, paying the price just as he did. King, like the prophets before him, knew the sapir-whorf, towering powers that overwhelm us when we think small, are themselves small-time. He reminded us that our Pentagon generals and Wall Street barons are not in ultimate charge of reality any more than we as individuals are. The arc of the universe, he said, bends toward justice. So let's not give up on our brother, Barack Obama, or on ourselves. Service. And let's not give up on our brothers and sisters in the Pentagon and on Wall Street. Nonviolence is the most powerful force in existence. We can all become part of its movement.

How a President Can Practice Satyagraha. On the critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, first day of school, September 8, 2009, at university essay Wakefield High School in Arlington, Virginia, a ninth-grader named Lilly asked President Obama, If you could have dinner with anyone, dead or alive, who would it be? The president said his first choice for critics sapir-whorf thesis, a dinner companion would be Gandhi, a real hero of mine, adding: If it hadn't been for english ks3, the nonviolent movement in sapir-whorf thesis India, you might not have seen the same nonviolent movement for civil rights here in the United States. He ended up doing so much and buy research writing service changing the critics sapir-whorf thesis, world just by the power of his ethics, by his ability to essay, change how people saw each other and saw themselves. [Gandhi was able to] help people who thought they had no power realize that they had power, and then help people who had a lot of power realize that if all they're doing is oppressing people, then that's not a really good exercise of power. Maybe we all need to sit down for a meal with Gandhi, one that would be, as President Obama told Lilly, a really small meal because he [like the impoverished people he represented] didn't eat a lot. What Gandhi would say to us over of the, that small meal he did say at papers the end of his life to a U.S. writer, Vincent Sheean, who traveled half-way around the world to question him on vital matters, anticipating that Gandhi was about to be assassinated -- as he would be, in Sheean's presence, three days later. As the two men paced a room together, Gandhi told his American visitor, with reference to World War II culminating in the atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Your ends may have been good but your means were bad.

That is not the way of truth. If Gandhi's earnest conversation partner were Obama, not Sheean, and the time today, perhaps the next question would be: What is the way of truth in Afghanistan? For Gandhi, truth was God. Truth-force was his term for nonviolence, satyagraha . Gandhi acted on critics sapir-whorf thesis, the belief that there is nothing we as human beings can do that is more powerful, more transforming, than to live out the truth as we know it at the deepest point in our conscience. In dialogue today with a powerful man who knows that oppressing people is on personal, not a really good exercise of critics thesis power, Gandhi would say that hearing the shy person, truth and acting on it, regardless of the consequences to one's power and critics of the sapir-whorf thesis one's self, would be the way of truth in english Afghanistan and in Washington. As politically confining as the White House is, it is for that very reason an ideal place to thesis, live out the truth, as President Kennedy did. Why It's Up to shy person essay, Us, the People, to of the, Practice Satyagraha. The ultimate reach of Lilly's question is paper service, a challenging one for us all, and critics sapir-whorf President Obama's mention of Gandhi is a seed of hope.

The month before his election as president, Barack Obama also invoked Gandhi as an inspiration, on that occasion Gandhi as the shy person, community organizer of a massive, nonviolent revolution. President-to-be Obama said Gandhi's portrait hangs in my office to critics sapir-whorf thesis, remind me that real change will not come from Washington -- it will come when the people, united, bring it to Washington. Obama's pre-election Gandhi statement included a reference to the war in Iraq: We've watched our standing in the world erode as we continue to lose American lives in a war that should've never been authorized and never been waged. Candidate Obama's words on research paper, Iraq apply with equal urgency today to the war in Afghanistan and a threatened war in Iran, in the context of a global strategy of war on terror that, as Gandhi would say, is not the way of critics truth. John Kennedy recognized that the wars he was pressured to wage on Cuba, Vietnam, and the Soviet Union, all claimed as strategic parts of a global war on communism, were not the way of truth. With great courage, he turned away from research paper those wars, and from the false ideology of critics of the war that justified them, to the truth of peacemaking. Had he not done so in the Cuban Missile Crisis, our planet would now be a nuclear wasteland. We can give thanks for the courage that took him to Dallas.

Yet the vision of Gandhi and King, and the words of Obama, remind us that the impetus for the kind of nonviolent change that is the condition for our survival will not come from Washington -- it will come when the people, united, bring it to research paper, Washington. Critics Sapir-whorf Thesis. To the powers that dominate the president and the world, the most unspeakable reality of all would be our discovery as a people, all over this country and this globe, of a force more powerful than war. The arc of the universe bends toward justice on earth, if we can believe in research paper it and act on it. Let it be. James W. Critics Of The. Douglass is a Catholic Worker and the author of JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters (being published as a Simon Schuster Touchstone paperback this fall). Source Citation: Douglass, James W. 2010. JFK, Obama, and the Unspeakable.

Tikkun 25 (6): 15. Will Obama Stop Betraying His Progressive Base? by papers ks3 Michael Lerner Not My Priorities: A National Campaign to Decrease Military Spending by Ellen Augustine Obama and a Foreign Policy of Generosity by Keith Ellison America to Washington: “We Have a Problem” by George Vradenburg The Transformative Promise of Queer Politics by Alana Yu-lan Price. COMMENT POLICY Please read our comments policy. We invite constructive disagreement but do not accept personal attacks and hateful comments. We reserve the critics of the sapir-whorf, right to on personal statement, block hecklers who repost comments that have been deleted.

We do have automated spam filters that sometimes miscategorize legitimate comments as spam. If you don't see your comment within ten minutes, please click here to contact us. Due to critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, our small staff it may take up to 48 hours to get your comment posted. 3 Responses to JFK, Obama, and the Unspeakable. Payday Loans November 22, 2011 at 11:29 pm.

You know therefore significantly when it comes to research paper, this subject, produced me personally consider it from numerous varied angles. Its like men and women aren’t involved unless it is critics of the, one thing to do with Lady gaga! Your personal stuffs great. Pitt. Always handle it up! Interesting article, but it misses two points. First, JFK was an elected president. Drone Man is, and always has been, a selected one. Critics. There was no way DM would go against the Military Industrial Complex since he could never have got to edinburgh archive, the Oval Office unless he’d been its creature from Day One. Ever since Bush was awarded the presidency after losing the popular vote, you haven’t had an elected president, and I doubt if you’ll ever have one again. For example your next selected president will be Killary Klingon. Secondly, war has now become a self-perpetuating industry.

The article flirts with, but skirts, that point. Of The. Wars aren’t meant to be won, they’re meant to be fought on and on and on, using jihadist cannibal headhunter or Nazi proxies if troops, drones or cruise missile “non-combat operations” can’t be carried out. DM has shown not the slightest, teensiest attempt to be anything but an enthusiastic participant in these war crimes. ? As far as Drone Man’s comments about Gandhi go, it’s a bad joke. Like the beauty pageant participants who all admire Mother Teresa.? Rene Descartes November 30, 2014 at 7:21 pm.

“An optimist may see a light where there is none, but why must the pessimist always run to university archive, blow it out?” – This is of the thesis, my first thought after reading this well thought out article and having that exquisite feeling of seeing the light at the end of the tunnel. Which by the way no amount of blowing will actually blow out as it is the only real thing in papers a world of delusion and critics sapir-whorf thesis illusions of smoke and mirrors which the ruling class uses to oppress the entire world. The LIGHT has WON thank GOD for that, it is time that you realize that your puppetry is based on the insanity that GOD-TRUTH would be defeated in the end.

Academic Proofreading -
Linguistic relativity - Wikipedia

Tips for Academic Writing and Other Formal Writing. It is a long list. People have a lot of problems. Some of the items sound picky or trivial, even to me. Yet bad grammar, bad style, and poor organization will make it very difficult for you to critics thesis, convey your ideas clearly and professionally, and will limit your academic and professional success. I strongly recommend that you work to eliminate any of these problems that may apply to university, your own writing. -- Dr.

James A. Bednar. Rules for of the thesis formal writing are quite strict, though often unstated. Formal writing is used in academic and scientific settings whenever you want to convey your ideas to a wide audience, with many possible backgrounds and buy research writing assumptions. Critics Sapir-whorf. Unlike casual conversation or emails to friends, formal writing needs to be clear, unambiguous, literal, and well structured. Formal writing is not just dictated conversation In general, it is inappropriate simply to write as you would speak. In conversation, the listener can ask for clarification or elaboration easily, and thus the speaker can use imprecise language, ramble from shy person topic to topic freely, and sapir-whorf thesis so on. Writing. Formal writing must instead stand on its own, conveying the author's thesis clearly through words alone. As a result, formal writing requires substantial effort to construct meaningful sentences, paragraphs, and arguments relevant to a well-defined thesis.

The best formal writing will be difficult to write but very easy to read. The author's time and effort spent on writing will be repaid with the thesis time and effort saved by the (many) readers. Make your thesis obvious throughout An essay, article, or report should have one main topic (the thesis) that is clearly evident in edinburgh archive, the introduction and conclusion. Of The. Of course, the thesis may itself be a conjunction or a contrast between two items, but it must still be expressible as a single, coherent point. In a short essay, the main point should usually conclude the pitt application essay introductory paragraph. In a longer essay, the sapir-whorf main point generally concludes the introductory section. The reader should never be in any doubt about essay on personal what your thesis is; whenever you think it might not be absolutely obvious, remind the reader again. When in doubt, use the recipe: introduce, expand/justify, conclude Paragraphs, subsections, sections, chapters, and books all use the same structure: first make the critics of the topic clear, then expand upon essay on personal statement it, and sapir-whorf finally sum up, tying everything back to the topic. At each level, you need to tell the reader what you will be trying to say (in this paragraph, section, etc.), then you need to essay, cover all the relevant material, clearly relating it to your stated point, and finally you need to tie the critics of the thesis subtopics together so that they do indeed add up to establish the point that you promised. Stay on topic Everything in your document should be related clearly to your main thesis.

You can write other papers later for anything else you might want to say. The reason your reader is pitt essay reading this particular paper of yours is that he or she wants to know about critics sapir-whorf your main topic, not simply about everything you might want to say (unless for shy person some narcissistic reason everything you might want to say is your clearly stated main topic). Conversely, there is no need to bring up items simply because they relate to your main topic, if you do not have anything to of the sapir-whorf, say about them. If you do bring something up, say something important about it! Staying on service topic does not mean being one sided To avoid being misleading, you will often need to acknowledge some weaknesses in critics of the thesis, your argument or discuss some merits of an papers ks3 opposing argument. It is quite appropriate to of the sapir-whorf thesis, discuss such opposing views when they are relevant, i.e., when they relate directly to university archive, the main topic of your paper.

For instance, if you are reviewing a paper and arguing that it was not written well overall, it is usually a good idea to point out the few things that were done well, e.g. Critics Sapir-whorf Thesis. so that the reader does not get the impression that you just like to complain :-) . Essay On Personal. Often such opposing observations fit well just after the introduction, providing a background for the rest of your arguments that follow. Whenever you do include such material, i.e. things that go in the direction opposite to of the thesis, your main thesis, be careful to research paper, put it into only a few well-defined places, reorganizing your argument to achieve that when necessary. Thesis. Jumping back and forth will confuse the essay on personal reader unnecessarily. In every case, try to sapir-whorf thesis, make your point as clearly as possible, while at the same time not overstating it and not pretending that no other valid viewpoints exist. Transitions are difficult but very important Each sentence in your document should follow smoothly from the essay on personal preceding sentence, and each paragraph should follow smoothly from the preceding paragraph. The world is arguably an unstructured jumble of ideas, but anything that you expect the reader to read from start to finish needs to critics of the thesis, be a linear progression along one single path. Transition words and english phrases are what make it possible for a reader to critics of the sapir-whorf, follow you easily as you explore the various ideas in research paper, your paper. Without good transitions, the reader will end up backtracking repeatedly, which will often cause your point to be lost or your paper to be tossed aside altogether. One clue that your writing needs better transitions is critics sapir-whorf thesis if you find that you can cut and paste paragraphs from one section to shy person essay, another without doing substantial rewriting of how the paragraph begins and ends. If making such rearrangements is easy, then you have not been linking your paragraphs into a coherent narrative that reads well from start to finish. In practice, making smooth transitions is critics of the very difficult.

Learning to do it takes a lot of practice at first, and actually making the english ks3 transitions smooth takes a lot of effort every time you write or revise something. One rule of of the sapir-whorf, thumb is that whenever you switch topics, you should try to provide a verbal clue that you are doing so, using transitions like However, . , As a result, . , For comparison, , etc. If you notice that you have to add these words between most of research paper, your sentences, not just the paragraphs, then you are bouncing around too much. In that case you need to reorganize your document to group related thoughts together, switching topics only of the thesis, when necessary. Once the research paper organization is good, all you can do is read and critics of the reread what you write, rewording it until each new item follows easily from those before it. Write what you mean, mean what you write Speakers use many informal, colloquial phrases in casual conversation, usually intending to convey meanings other than what the words literally indicate. For instance, we often speak informally of research paper, going the extra mile, at the end of the critics thesis day, hard facts, things being crystal clear or pretty convincing, someone sticking to a topic, readers being turned off, something really being the case, etc. Avoid such imprecise writing in formal prose -- whenever possible, the words you write should literally mean exactly what they say. If there were no miles involved, do not write of extra ones; if there was no crystal, do not write about its clarity. Among other benefits, avoiding such informal language will ensure that your meaning is obvious even to those who have not learned the currently popular idioms, such as those for whom English is a second language and those who might read your writing years from now or in university application essay, another part of the world.

Formal writing should be clear to sapir-whorf, as many people as possible, and its meaning should not depend on the whims of on personal, your local dialect of of the, English. It is a permanent and public record of your ideas, and should mean precisely what you have written. Avoid redundancy Unfortunately, specifying minimum page requirements encourages redundancy, but please try to avoid that temptation. When two words will do, there is no need to pitt, use twenty. Whenever you finish a sentence or paragraph, read over it to see if any words or sentences can be eliminated -- often your point will get much stronger when you do so. In the academic community, your ability to write concisely is far more important than your ability to fill up a page with text. Academic courses specify page minimums to ensure that you write an essay of the appropriate depth, not to test whether you can say the same thing a dozen different ways just to fill up space. Of The. In the real world, you will see many more page maximum specifications than page minimums. Be professional and diplomatic When writing about another's work, always write as if your subject may read your document. Your essays for a course assignment will probably not be published, but genuine scientific writing will be, and the subject of your paper may very well come across your work eventually. Thus it is crucial to avoid pejorative, insulting, and offensive terms like attempt to, a waste of time, pointless, etc.

If some of the essays I have seen were read out loud to the author under discussion, a fistfight would probably result. At the very least, you would have made an essay enemy for life, which is rarely a good idea. In any case, your points will be much more convincing if you can disagree professionally and critics thesis diplomatically, without attacking the author or implying that he or she is an research paper imbecile. And, finally, no one will publish your work if it is just a diatribe and not a sober, reasoned argument. To avoid these sorts of sapir-whorf thesis, problems, it might be good to pretend that you are the author under discussion and shy person essay re-read your essay through his or her eyes. It should be straightforward to critics of the sapir-whorf, figure out buy research service, which parts would make you defensive or angry, and critics sapir-whorf you can then reword those. Avoid imperative voice Use imperative voice sparingly in a scientific paper, because it comes across as rude (as do many of the sentences in what you are reading right now!). Pitt University Essay. E.g. do not say Recall that . Critics Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. . Of course, an occasional imperative in parentheses is not objectionable (e.g. Essay On Personal Statement. (see Walker 1996 for more details).). A formal document needs to be structured at all levels, whether or not the structure is of the sapir-whorf made explicit using section labels or other visible clues. Overall structure The standard format for an effective essay or article is to: (1) present a coherent thesis in the introduction, (2) try your hardest to convince the reader of your thesis in edinburgh university archive, the body of the paper, and (3) restate the thesis in the conclusion so that the reader remains quite sure what your thesis is, and so that the reader can decide whether he or she was convinced. Using any other format for a formal article is almost invariably a bad idea.

The introduction and conclusions do not always need to be labeled as such, but they need to critics of the, be there. Note that an abstract is no substitute for edinburgh dissertation an introduction; abstracts act as an of the thesis independent miniature version of the article, not part of the university introduction. Each paragraph is one relevant sub-topic Each paragraph in a document should have one topic that is clearly evident early in the paragraph. Every paragraph should have a clear relationship to the main topic of your document; if not, either the paragraph should be eliminated, or the main topic should be revised. Use complete sentences Except in extraordinary circumstances, sentences in of the, the main text must be complete, i.e., they must have a subject and a verb, so that they express an entire thought, not just a fragment or the essay beginning of a thought. Note that most -ing words are not verbs. The light turning green is critics just a fragment, i.e., a start to a sentence or a part of one. To be a sentence that you could use on its own followed by a period, it would have to be The light turned green, which has both a subject and a verb.

Put appropriate punctuation between sentences. Two complete sentences can be divided with a period, question mark, or exclamation point, or they can be weakly connected as clauses with a semicolon. However, they can never be connected with a comma in formal writing! To see if your writing has this problem, consider each of your commas in turn. If you could replace the comma with a period, leaving two complete, meaningful sentences, then that comma is an error -- a comma can never be used like that! Instead, replace the comma with a semicolon, in edinburgh university, case you have two sentences that need to be linked in critics of the thesis, some generic way, or make the linkage explicit with a conjunction, or simply use a period, to leave two complete and independent sentences. Section titles Section titles for an article should say exactly and succinctly what the application reader will get out of that section. Thesis. In most relatively short documents, using a standard set of section titles is english papers ks3 best so that people can scan through your document quickly. Section standards vary in different fields, but a common set is: Introduction, Background, Methods (for an experimental paper) or Architecture (for a modeling paper), Discussion, Future Work (often merged with Discussion), and Conclusion. If you do not use the standard titles, e.g. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf. if you have labeled lower-level subsections, you should be quite explicit about shy person what is in that section.

Such labels should make sense to someone who has not yet read that section, and make it clear why they should read it. For instance, a section about adding a second eye to a simulation of single-eye vision could truthfully be called Multiple eyes, but that title is meaningless to critics thesis, someone scanning the document. Instead, it should be something like Extending the paper service model to explain stereo vision whose meaning will be clear to the type of person likely to critics of the thesis, be reading the paper. Everything important goes in your introduction and conclusion Everyone who looks at your paper will at least skim the introduction and conclusion, and those who read it in depth will remember those two sections the best. So make sure that your most important points are quite prominent and english ks3 unmissable in sapir-whorf, those sections.

Say it, never just say that you will say it In the introduction, conclusion, and abstract (if any), do not merely describe what you are going to say or have said; actually say it! For instance, do not just state that I will discuss and english papers evaluate this paper if you will later argue that (for example) it is not convincing. Instead state that the paper is unconvincing, and (in brief) why you believe that to be the case. Critics Of The Thesis. Then you can elaborate on that point in archive, subsequent paragraphs. Subsections If you have sections 1, 1.1, and 1.2, there must be introductory material between 1 and of the sapir-whorf thesis 1.1 that explains briefly what is in the subsections, mentioned in the order of the subsections. That is, 1.1 should never follow just after 1 without some intervening text.

If you have 1.1, there must always be a 1.2; otherwise 1 and 1.1 should be merged. Each 1.x subsection should end with a concluding statement of what has been established in writing service, that subsection, wrapping things up before moving on to the next subsection. Figure captions Different communities have different expectations on what to critics, put into figure captions. University Archive. Some journals, like Science , have very long captions, which are meant to be readable independently of the of the sapir-whorf main article. That way, readers can skim articles and only look at interesting figures, before deciding whether to read the whole article. In such cases, you must ensure that all of the main points of the figure are also mentioned in the text of the article, so that someone reading the article straight through will not miss them. Other journals and other publications like books, theses, and shy person essay proposals tend to have very little in of the sapir-whorf, the caption, with the figures being understandable only when reading the main text. Essay. Even in such cases, I myself prefer to put all the critics sapir-whorf graphical details like the dotted line represents in the caption, plus enough context so that the import of the figure is clear. You are welcome to have your own preferences, but you should be aware of what you are trying to achieve, i.e. whether you want the caption to be readable on its own. Try hard to avoid ambiguous references Conversation is shy person essay replete with ambiguous words like this, these, his, it, they, etc.

These words have no meaning in themselves, but in conversation the meaning is usually clear from the context. In written text, however, the critics of the sapir-whorf thesis intended meaning is quite often not evident to papers, the reader, because there are e.g. many possible interpretations of it and critics thesis this. It is english papers a good idea to read over anything you write, searching for this sort of word. For each instance, first ask yourself To what specific item does this term refer?. For such a reference to make sense, the object, person, or concept must have been explicitly mentioned just prior to your reference. Critics Of The Thesis. Often you will find that it or they refers to papers ks3, something vague that was not even discussed explicitly in your paper, in of the thesis, which case you should reword your text entirely. Even if the item to which you refer is explicitly mentioned in your paper, ask yourself whether there is any chance that the reader might not know to which of several items you might be referring. E.g. for the word he, were there two or three people being discussed? If so then state the actual name of each; he would be ambiguous. Often an ambiguous this or these can be disambiguated by adding a noun that specifies precisely the type of object or concept to which you are referring.

For instance, this argument or this paper is less confusing than simply this. That is, do not use this followed directly by a verb phrase, but you can use this before a noun phrase, as in shy person essay, this sentence is a good example of the use of the of the thesis word 'this'. Watch out for homonyms Spell checkers are wonderful, but they are absolutely useless for shy person essay detecting misused homonyms or near-homonyms, i.e., actual words whose meaning is confused with other actual words. Critics Of The Thesis. As a result, homonyms are probably the shy person essay most common spelling errors in word-processed text. Even if you are lazy and let the spell checker fix all of your other words, make certain that you know the differences between words like: If you do not know the difference, you must simply avoid using any of these words. Critics Of The Thesis. Yet because the essay on personal spell checker takes care of all the other words you may misspell, learning to sapir-whorf, use these few words correctly is paper service surely not much of a burden, and sapir-whorf thesis is crucial for convincing your readers that you are competent and writing service trustworthy. Avoid comprise Apparently the word comprise has now been used incorrectly so many times to mean compose that this usage is now becoming acceptable. But it is much safer simply to avoid comprise altogether, as anyone who does know what it started out meaning will be annoyed when you use it to mean compose. But and however are not interchangeable The words but and however have similar meanings, but they are not interchangeable.

If you take a grammatically correct sentence containing but and replace it with however, or vice versa, the result will almost always be incorrect, mainly because of comma punctuation. I like oranges, but I do not like tangerines. I like oranges. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. However, I do not like tangerines. I like oranges; however, I do not like tangerines. I, however, do not like grapefruits.

I like oranges however they have been prepared. If you exchange any of these buts and howevers, then the sentences would become incorrect, and in some cases meaningless. A point is a single item The word point can only research paper, be used for a single, atomic item. Thus it is not appropriate to discuss a sub-point, part of a point, the first half of a point, etc. Sapir-whorf Thesis. Instead use topic or section, etc.

A research There is buy research paper writing no noun phrase a research in sapir-whorf thesis, English. Use a study or just research, never a research. Similarly, there is no separate plural form of research; researches is an English verb, not a noun. Avoid capitalization When in doubt, use lower case. Capitalization is appropriate only for specific, named, individual items or people. For example, capitalize school subjects only when you are referring to a specific course at a specific school: math is essay a general subject, but Math 301 is critics thesis a particular course.

Similarly: Department of Computer Sciences vs. a computer science department, the president vs. President Bush. When in doubt, use lower case. Avoid contractions Contractions are appropriate only for pitt application conversational use and for informal writing, never for technical or formal writing. Hyphenate phrases only when otherwise ambiguous In English phrases (groups of several words forming a unit), hyphens are used to group pairs of words when the meaning might otherwise be ambiguous.

That is, they act like the parentheses in a mathematical expression. Of The Sapir-whorf. They should normally otherwise be avoided unless they are part of a single word (or the dictionary explicitly requires them), i.e., it is a mistake to essay, use a hyphen where the meaning was already clear and unambiguous. For instance, long adjective phrases preceding a noun sometimes include another noun temporarily being used as an adjective. Such phrases can often be parsed several different ways with different meanings. For example, the phrase English language learners as written means language learners from critics thesis England, because, by default, language modifies learners, and English modifies language learners. Shy Person. But the phrase that was intended was probably English-language learners, i.e. learners of the English language, and using the hyphen helps make that grouping clear. Note that there would never be a hyphen if the same phrase were used after the noun it modifies, because in that case there would be absolutely no chance of ambiguity: a learner of the English language ( NEVER a learner of the critics of the thesis English-language; the hyphen effectively turns the noun phrase English language into an adjective, and a prepositional phrase starting with of the research paper must be completed with a noun, not an adjective). Note that hyphens are used only in adjective phrases; they are not needed after an sapir-whorf thesis adverb (and are therefore incorrect). University. An adverb explicitly modifies the adjective immediately following it, never a noun.

For instance, a quickly dropping stock cannot possibly be mistaken for a quickly dropping-stock, because adverbs like quickly cannot modify a noun phrase like dropping stock, and so quickly clearly must modify dropping. In general, there should never be a hyphen after an adverb ending in ly, though hyphens are sometimes necessary after some non-adverbial ly words like early (as in the correct examples an sapir-whorf thesis early-rising rooster or an early-rising English-language learner). You may want to search through your finished document for ly-; nearly all examples of those three characters in a row will be mistakes. In some very complicated phrases, two levels of grouping can be achieved using an research paper en dash, i.e. a slightly longer dash than a hyphen. For instance, a language-learning--associated problem would be a problem associated with language learning; the hyphen groups language and learning, while the en-dash -- connects language learning with associated.

Without hyphens or without the en-dash, the phrase would be quite difficult to read. But in such cases it is often clearer just to reword the of the sapir-whorf thesis sentence to avoid the ambiguity, as in a problem associated with language learning. In cases where the word grouping is essay quite obvious because the pair of words are so often used together, the hyphen can be omitted even when it would strictly be required to avoid ambiguity. For instance chocolate chip cookies is unlikely to be misread as chocolate chip-cookies, despite that being the literal interpretation, and so the hyphen can usually be omitted from of the thesis chocolate-chip cookies. In general, you should hyphenate a phrase when that particular sentence would otherwise be ambiguous. In any other case, even a nearby sentence containing the application same phrase but e.g. after the noun it modifies, you should leave out the critics sapir-whorf thesis hyphen. Edinburgh. I.e., the hyphen is not a property of the phrase, but of how you are using the phrase in the sentence. American vs. British English I myself am American by birth, despite lecturing in critics thesis, a British university, and I use American spellings by default (e.g. Ks3. organization, not organisation).

Authors are generally free to use whichever spelling they prefer, although publishers will often change the spellings to make e.g. Critics Sapir-whorf. all the papers in a certain edited volume use the writing same conventions. Critics Of The Thesis. Thus please do not hesitate to use whichever one of the (correct) spellings you are more comfortable with, as long as you keep it consistent throughout the document. Formatting and grammar rules When in doubt about grammar or page format, researchers in psychology and computer science generally follow the shy person APA style guide; biological fields use similar standards. Unfortunately, you do have to pay for critics of the thesis the APA guide, though it is now available in a less-expensive electronic edition. Pay attention to how your document looks Use readable, clear fonts and reasonable margins, following the typical format used for similar documents. If your word processor cannot make the spacing regular between words (e.g. most versions of Microsoft Word), turn off right justification.

Poor spacing makes the page look jumbled and pitt essay seem incoherent, even if the critics of the sapir-whorf writing is not. Nearly all formal writing should simply be stapled --- anything else looks unprofessional. For instance, using a fancy cover and binding for a short paper or report is distracting and essay makes it difficult to photocopy the paper; such binding is necessary only for long papers that a staple would have trouble keeping together. At the opposite critics of the extreme, it should be obvious that folding one corner is not an acceptable substitute for university archive a staple. Authors are authors, not writers The people who perform a scientific study are called authors, never writers, even though the results are presented in a written paper. Scientific authorship includes much more than the actual writing, and critics of the sapir-whorf thesis some authors may well not have written any word in the paper. Use last names Never refer to the authors by edinburgh university their first names, as if they were your friends. They are not, and even if they were, it would be inappropriate to draw attention to that circumstance.

Except in unusual cases to sapir-whorf thesis, avoid ambiguity or to discuss specific people (e.g. the original founders of a field of research), first names are not even mentioned in the body of a scientific text; the research paper last names are sufficient. Author names are keys -- spell them properly In academic writing, an critics sapir-whorf author's last name is like the university key in critics thesis, a database lookup -- if the edinburgh archive name is misspelled (e.g. Davis for Davies), your reader will not be able to locate works by that author in the library or online. Moreover, it is extraordinarily impolite to misspell someone's name when you are discussing them; doing so shows that you have not paid much attention to them or their work. So you should make a special effort to spell author names correctly, double and triple checking them against the original source, and ensuring that you spell them the same way each time. Use appropriate pronouns Use appropriate pronouns when referring to the authors. Critics Of The Thesis. If there are multiple authors, use they or the essay authors or the authors' last names, not he or the author. Critics Sapir-whorf. If there is english papers ks3 only one author and you can determine the gender with great confidence, you may use he or she; otherwise use the author or the author's last name.

Referring to other texts Use double quotes around the sapir-whorf thesis title of an article when you refer to it in the text. Italics are reserved for books or other works of service, similar length. Avoid underlining altogether --- underlining is just a way of indicating that handwritten or typewritten text should be typeset in italics, and is thus inappropriate when italics are available (as they are on of the sapir-whorf thesis any modern word processor). Be very precise when discussing an author discussing another author For better or worse, academic writing often devolves into discussions of on personal, what one author said about another author. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf. If commenting on pitt such controversies, you should be extremely careful about using ambiguous terms like his, the author, etc. Very often your reader will have no idea which of the critics sapir-whorf thesis various authors you are referring to, even though it may be clear to you.

When in doubt, use the actual last names instead, even if they might sound repetitive. Avoid footnotes Footnotes should be used quite sparingly, and should never be used as a way to english, avoid the hard work of making your text flow into a coherent narrative. Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. Only when something genuinely cannot be made to fit into the main flow of the text, yet is somehow still so important that it must be mentioned, does it go into shy person a footnote. Avoid direct quotes In scientific (as opposed to of the sapir-whorf, literary or historical) writing, direct quotes should be used only when the precise wording of the original sentences is important, e.g. if the work is so groundbreaking that the words themselves have driven research in on personal statement, this field. In nearly every other case, paraphrasing is more appropriate, because it lets you formulate the idea in the terms suitable for your particular paper, focusing on the underlying issue rather than the way one author expressed it. Be careful with arguments about grammar If you are going to criticize the grammar or spelling of an author in of the, writing, you should be extraordinarily careful to verify that you are correct. Reading a long rant from an American about how a person of research paper, British upbringing has supposedly misspelled words like utilisation, or vice versa, can be quite painful.

There is no need to mention explicitly reading the paper A lot of students use phrases like while reading this paper, I . Of The. and edinburgh university dissertation archive In this paper the authors . . Try to avoid this redundancy. If you use the word author you need not also use paper, and vice versa. Similarly, it is clear that whatever you discovered about the paper, you discovered while reading the paper; we do not need to be reminded of this. Of The Sapir-whorf. Academic writing is essay always about papers and authors, and critics of the sapir-whorf thus those topics should only be discussed when they are relevant. Discussing existing work Whenever you bring up an writing service existing piece of of the thesis, research, whether it is your own or someone else's, there is a standard way of edinburgh archive, doing it properly.

First you say what the research showed, then you say what its limitations are, and then you say how your own work is going to overcome those limitations. I.e., say what has been done, what has not been done, and how you are going to do some of what has not been done. If you are doing a literature review rather than an of the sapir-whorf original research paper, you just describe what you think should be done, rather than what you plan to do. Unless you want to make an enemy, you should always mention something positive about existing work before exploring the limitations, and application you should always assume that the person you are discussing will read what you wrote. Of course, sometimes there is sapir-whorf a good reason to make an papers enemy, e.g. to draw attention to yourself by critics sapir-whorf thesis attacking someone famous, but you should be sure to choose your enemies wisely. Discussing proposed work In a research proposal, it is pitt university application essay never acceptable to announce only critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, that you are planning to study topic X. Paper Writing. In the context of research, studying is critics of the a vague and unbounded task, with no criterion for success and no way to tell if you are getting anywhere. Studying is something you do in a course, where someone can tell you what to focus on pitt and can test you to see if you got the right answer; research is not like that.

In research, you need to spell out the thesis specific questions you are going to try to answer, the specific phenomena that need explanations, and so on -- it's up to you to define the question and the methods, and until you've done so, it's not research, just idle speculation. Discussion/future work In the discussion sections of a research paper, be sure to discuss all topics that the audience expected to see in the paper, even if you yourself do not believe them to be relevant. The reader is more likely to research paper, assume that you have been sloppy about your literature review than to assume you knew about the work but believed it not to be relevant. Page restrictions can help here --- they provide a good excuse for omitting topics that you do not believe to be relevant. In a longer article or thesis without page limits you have no choice but to address the issue and explicitly state why the topic is not relevant despite the common belief that it is. Bibliographies Students often seem to think that bibliographies are mysterious, tricky things with rules far too complex to critics of the, understand or remember. Although there is essay a vast array of different bibliographic formats, the underlying principles are actually not complicated at all.

Simply put, all bibliographies must have a certain basic minimum standard of information in order to fulfill their function of allowing people to critics of the thesis, locate the specific item of reference material you cite. In particular, every bibliography entry needs an author, date, and title, every journal article absolutely must have a volume and page numbers, and every conference paper must have the title of the conference proceedings, the page numbers, and some indication of who published it. Without having every bit of this basic information, there is no way to be sure that readers can find the one specific article that you are discussing. Edinburgh University Archive. Conversely, you should not include anything not necessary or useful for locating the article, such as the cost of reprints. As long as the correct information is critics of the sapir-whorf included, there are many acceptable bibliography formats, though note that in all cases each entry ends in a period. Citations The bibliography or reference list in edinburgh, an academic paper must consist of precisely those sources that you cite in critics, the text, without any extra sources and without omitting any. Each citation must provide enough information for essay statement the reader to find the correct source in the bibliography; beyond that, any number of citation formats will do unless there is thesis some specific standard you are told to follow. English Ks3. One common approach is to use author-date citations like (Smith, Wu, and Tong 2008), but other approaches such as numbering the critics of the sapir-whorf thesis bibliography entries and then using bracketed or superscript numbers are also fine. If using numeric citations with brackets, note that there must always be a space before the first bracket, as in . known [1], ( not . known[1]). If using author-date citations, you must remember that any item in english papers, parentheses does not exist , as far as the grammar of the of the sapir-whorf sentence is concerned, and thus it cannot be used as part of the sentence. Thus the rule is research paper simply to put the critics sapir-whorf thesis parentheses around the edinburgh archive part that would be acceptable to omit when reading aloud, as in Carlin (1972) showed that. Critics Of The Thesis. or . as seen in rats (Carlin 1972). ( not (Carlin 1972) showed that. Essay On Personal Statement. and critics not . as seen in rats Carlin (1972).).

It is usually best to have only a single level of parentheses, because multiple parentheses start to distract from the buy research paper writing service main text. Thus I would prefer has been established (but for a counterexample see Johnson, 1905) to has been established (but for a counterexample see Johnson (1905)). I and critics thesis we Writing standards disagree about whether to use I and we (and their various forms) in academic work. Some argue that those personal pronouns distract from what should be objective and scientifically valid without recourse to any particular speaker, or even that they just do not sound scientific. Others argue that omitting I and edinburgh dissertation we results in awkward, passive sentences rather than direct We did X sentences. Personally, I believe that academic writing should use personal pronouns whenever what is being reported was an arbitrary and specific choice made by a human being, or for of the opinions or personal judgment, precisely because these pronouns emphasize that a human was involved in the work. When reporting universal scientific facts or observations, I would not use personal pronouns, because any reasonable observer would have reported similar results and papers thus there is no need to critics sapir-whorf thesis, emphasize the role of the authors. Thus, personally, I believe that I and pitt university we have their place in academic writing, i.e., to emphasize the human element where appropriate; in other circumstances I would discourage their use.

Please note that I happen to of the sapir-whorf, disagree with a few of the on personal rules commonly accepted for of the sapir-whorf thesis English text, and in the text on this page I happily use my own rules instead. You might wish to follow the accepted usage in such cases, though I would much rather everyone used my own much better rules as listed below. Edinburgh. If you do agree to join my one-man campaign to fix the English language, I cannot accept any responsibility for points deducted by less enlightened folks. :-) Punctuation after quotations In American English (and in of the, some cases for english British English), punctuation following a bit of critics of the, quoted text is traditionally placed inside the quotation. However, I consider that rule an egregious violation of the pitt essay whole notion of critics of the sapir-whorf, quotation, i.e. an obvious bug in the English language. For example, if I am quoting someone who said that life is hard, I always put the comma outside the university essay quotation mark because they themselves did not necessarily have a pause when they said it; in fact, they probably had a full stop (which would be written as a period). Critics Of The. Accepted American usage is to write life is hard, but the computer programmer in buy research paper, me just cannot be convinced to make such an obvious semantic error. Spaces around dashes An em-dash is a long dash, longer than an en-dash and a hyphen. The traditional formatting for an em-dash does not use any spaces, as in life is critics of the sapir-whorf hard---then you die. However, I myself much prefer to essay on personal, put a space before and after the dash.

Without the spaces the dash appears to of the thesis, be connecting two words like hard---then, which makes no grammatical sense. Grammatically, the function of the research paper dash is to separate and critics of the thesis connect phrases or clauses, not words, and I prefer to make that visually clear by putting spaces around the dash. Shy Person Essay. Again, in my opinion the accepted usage is a bug in the language. Dangling prepositions Officially, it is an error to end a sentence with a preposition, as in they arrived at the place they were heading to. However, in practice it is often very difficult and awkward to critics sapir-whorf, reword sentences to avoid dangling prepositions. Thus I consider this rule to be optional at best. Serial commas In Britain and some other less-enlightened countries, the comma is often omitted before an essay statement 'and' in a list. For instance, they will write of ham, chips and eggs, rather than ham, chips, and critics sapir-whorf thesis eggs. I consider this an appalling, confusing construction, because it meaninglessly groups the last two items in the list together. Lists are generally meant to be collections of equals, so there should be just as many separators between chips and eggs as between ham and statement chips. In many cases, omitting the serial comma is ambiguous.

Moreover, in the very rare case where adding the comma is ambiguous, the sentence should be rewritten anyway. Critics Sapir-whorf Thesis. Oxford University Press, at least, agrees with me; see the Wikipedia serial comma entry. Again, this insistence on edinburgh dissertation archive using appropriate syntax is of the sapir-whorf thesis probably driven by shy person the computer programmer in me, but I think all right-thinking people should be offended whenever a serial comma is of the omitted. Commas after i.e. and e.g. Many grammar books state that a comma is always required after i.e. and e.g. Research Paper. used in a sentence, as in sentences often contain spelling errors, i.e., words spelled incorrectly.

The inspiration for of the this rule is that such abbreviations should be mentally expanded to the English translation of the Latin phrase for which they stand (i.e. translating to that is, and e.g. translating to essay, for example, which in itself is an important distinction to know). However, these terms come up very often in of the sapir-whorf thesis, formal writing, and in many cases I consider it inappropriate to add symbolic pauses (i.e. commas) around them. Such pauses break up the shy person flow of the sentence, and modern readers treat the abbreviations just as they would any other word, without internally translating them to Latin phrases and then English phrases. Critics. Thus in many cases I prefer to omit the research paper comma after the abbreviation, and sometimes also the one before it. Some people, even more pedantic than I, disagree. This document is in the public domain.

You are free to thesis, copy it, redistribute it, modify it, or use it for research paper any other non-fraudulent purpose. If redistributing a complete copy or a lengthy excerpt, please (1) retain this notice, (2) clearly mark the original author, and (3) clearly mark any changes that you make as your own and critics not those of the original author.

Custom Essay Writing Service -
Critics of the sapir whorf thesis point …

20 Great Examples of PowerPoint Presentation Design. We can all agree that, in most cases, there's more than one way of doing something. Critics Thesis? For example, some people default to edinburgh university dissertation archive, the loop, swoop, and critics of the pull method when they tie their shoes, while others swear by the bunny ears technique. Either way you swing it, your shoes get tied, right? Trouble is, in some areas of life, different approaches don't always return the same results. When it comes to presentation design, for instance, there's no shortage of avenues you can take. And while all that choice -- colors, formats, visuals, fonts -- can feel liberating, it's important that you're careful in shy person essay, your selection as not all design combinations add up to success. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf? Download the full collection of PowerPoint presentation design examples here. We're not saying there's one right way to design your next PowerPoint presentation, but we are saying that some designs make more sense than others.

To see some examples of the best PowerPoint presentation designs, check out the following decks. 20 of the Best Examples of PowerPoint Presentation Design. 1) The Search for Meaning in B2B Marketing, Velocity Partners. Buy Research Service? We've said it once, and we'll say it again: We love this presentation from Velocity Partner's Co-Founder Doug Kessler. Not only critics sapir-whorf thesis, is the content remarkable, but the design is also quite clever. While each slide employs the same background visual, the copy in the notebook unfolds brilliantly through a series of colorful doodles and bold text. This gives the presentation a personal feel, which aligns with the self-reflective nature of the concept. 2) You Don't Suck at PowerPoint, Jesse Desjardins. Essay On Personal? If the contrast used throughout this PowerPoint presentation design were a human, we'd marry it.

This skillful presentation from Jesse Desjardins employs the perfect color palette: balancing black and white photos with pops of critics sapir-whorf thesis florescent pink, yellow, and blue. The cheeky vintage photos work to reinforce the copy on each slide, making the presentation both interesting and visually appealing. 3) Build a Better Entrepreneur Pitch Deck, Center for Entrepreneurial Innovation. Balancing visual backgrounds with text isn't easy. More often than not, the text is formatted in a way that winds up getting lost in the image. This presentation from the Center for Entrepreneurial Information combated this issue by combining a blurring effect with a shaded filter to create contrast between the bulleted text and the busy background. Well done. Research Paper? 4) 40 Tools in critics sapir-whorf, 20 Minutes: Hacking your Marketing Career, Eric Leist.

When you're tasked with presenting a lot of information in a little bit of time, things can get sort of university messy. To simplify this type of presentation, it's a good idea to use a visual table of contents like the critics of the sapir-whorf, one shown above. Essay On Personal Statement? This color-coded index clearly signifies the start and critics of the finish of each section to make it easier for the viewer to follow along and keep track of the information. Research Paper? 5) How to Craft Your Company's Storytelling Voice, MarketingProfs. 6) 2015 Travel Trends, Creative Lodging Solutions. If you're going to go the minimalistic route, take note of this PowerPoint presentation example from Creative Lodging Solutions. This clean design adheres to a simple, consistent color palette with clean graphics peppered throughout to make the slides more visually interesting. Overall there are no frills or unnecessary additions, which allows the critics of the sapir-whorf, informative content to take priority.

This presentation dates back to 2009, but the university dissertation, design is still as good as ever. The colorful, quirky doodles help tell the story while also serving as an interesting way to illustrate data (see slides 20 and 21). For visual learners, this approach is much more inviting than a series of slides riddled with text-heavy bullet points. 8) Eco-nomics: The Hidden Costs of Consumption, Josh Beatty. This presentation employs both powerful images and playful graphics to illustrate the of the sapir-whorf thesis, point.

While many of the slides contain numbers, they are broken up in a way that makes them easily digestible. Not to mention all of the text is crisp, clean, and concise. 9) 10 Powerful Body Language Tips for Your Next Presentation, SOAP. This simplistic presentation example employs several different fonts, but instead of coming off as disconnected, the varied fonts worth with one another to create contrast and call out edinburgh university dissertation archive, specific concepts. Also, the big, bold numbers help set the reader's expectations, as they clearly signify how far along the viewer is in the list of critics of the tips. 10) Pixar's 22 Rules to Phenomenal Storytelling, Gavin McMahon. Papers Ks3? This presentation by Gavin McMahon features color in all the right places. While each of the background images boasts a bright, spotlight-like design, all of the of the, characters are intentionally blacked out. This helps keep the focus on the tips, while still incorporating a visual element. Not to mention, it's still easy for the viewer to identify each character without the details. (I found you on slide eight, Nemo.) 11) Digital, Social Mobile in 2015, We Are Social. Here's another great example of data visualization in the wild.

Rather than displaying numbers and statistics straight up, this presentation calls upon dissertation archive interesting, colorful graphs and charts to present the information in a way that just makes sense. 12) 6 Snapchat Hacks Too Easy to Ignore, Gary Vaynerchuk. Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis? This wouldn't be a true Gary Vaynerchuk presentation if it wasn't a little loud, am i right? Aside from the fact that we love the edinburgh dissertation archive, eye-catching, bright yellow background (which aligns with the SnapChat theme), Vaynerchuk does a great job of incorporating screenshots on each slide to create a visual tutorial that coincides with the tips. 13) 20 Tweetable Quotes to critics of the thesis, Inspire Marketing Design Creative Genius, IMPACT Branding Design. We've all seen our fair share of quote-chronicling presentations . but that isn't to say they were all done well. Often times the background images are poor quality, the text is too small, or there isn't enough contrast. Well, this PowerPoint presentation from IMPACT Branding Design suffers from none of said challenges. Ks3? The colorful filters over each background image create just enough contrast for critics sapir-whorf the quotes to stand out. 14) The Top 20 Facts About High Fructose Corn Syrup, Corn Refiners Association. Statement? This is critics of the another great example of minimalistic design done right.

There's nothing overly complicated about this presentation's design, which is shy person why it works. Sapir-whorf? The text is large and shy person essay legible, the images are high quality and placed in of the sapir-whorf, a way that's not obtrusive, and the facts are called out from the rest of the buy research paper writing service, text. Critics Sapir-whorf? 15) Creating Powerful Customer Experiences, Digital Surgeons. This presentation offers up a lot of information in a way that doesn't feel overwhelming. Different colors are used to differentiate one set of numbers from another (see slide eight), and colorful graphics are used to make the shy person essay, information seem less buttoned-up. Not going to critics sapir-whorf, lie, it was the title that convinced me to click through to this presentation . but the paper writing, awesome design kept me there once I arrived. This simple design adheres to a consistent color pattern and leverages bullet points and sapir-whorf varied fonts to break up the text nicely. 17) Digital Transformation in 50 Soundbites, Julie Dodd. This design highlights a great alternative to the text-over-image display we've grown used to research paper, seeing.

By leveraging a split screen approach to each slide, Julie Dodd was able to serve up a clean, legible quote without sacrificing the power of a strong visual. Of The Sapir-whorf? 18) SMOKE: The Convenient Truth, Empowered Presentations! All of the essay statement, elements are working together here to create a compelling, unified presentation. Of The? From the font choice to the color palette to the dark visual background images, this design aligns perfectly with the dissertation, context of the copy. Simple, clever doodles tell the story of critics of the sapir-whorf thesis Google in a fun and creative way. This presentation reads almost like a storybook, making it easy to move from one slide to the next. Edinburgh Archive? This uncluttered approach provides viewers with an easy-to-understand explanation of a complicated topic.

20) What Really Differentiates the Best Content Marketers From The Rest, Ross Simmonds. Sapir-whorf Thesis? Let's be honest: These graphics are hard not to love. University Archive? Rather than employing the same old stock photos we've seen time and time again, this unique design serves as a refreshing way to present information that's both valuable and fun. We especially appreciate the critics sapir-whorf thesis, author's cartoonified self-portrait that closes out the presentation. Well played, Ross Simmonds. What's your favorite PowerPoint presentation?

Let us know in the comments section below. Editor's Note: This post was originally published in May 2010 and english has been updated for freshness, accuracy, and comprehensiveness.

Pay for Exclusive Essay -
Ask A Linguist FAQ: The Sapir-Whorf …

complete resume Ryerson Image Centre, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada “The Edge of the of the Earth: Climate Change in research paper, Photography and Video,” selections from of the sapir-whorf thesis Midway: Message from the university Gyre (September 14 - December 4, 2016) Horace Mann School, Bronx, NY (April 4 - 23, 2016) selected works. Amarillo Museum of critics of the thesis, Art, Amarillo TX “Chris Jordan: Running the archive Numbers” (October 23, 2015 - January 3, 2015) Sophie Gannon Gallery, Melbourne, Australia, April 2015, “Chris Jordan (USA)| Intolerable Beauty: Facing the critics of the Mirror of Mass Consumption”

Bryan Oliver Gallery, Whitworth University, Spokane, WA “Running the edinburgh dissertation archive Numbers” Julian Scott Memorial Gallery, Johnson State College, Johnson, VT, “Midway: Message from the Gyre” University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, “Chris Jordan: Running the critics of the sapir-whorf thesis Numbers” Science Museum of Virginia, Richmond, VA, “Chris Jordan: Running the writing service Numbers” Art Center Sarasota, Sarasota, FL, “Running the critics sapir-whorf thesis Numbers: Portraits of Mass Consumption” University of paper writing, New Hampshire, Durham, NH, “Chris Jordan: Running the of the thesis Numbers” Carleton College Art Gallery, Northfield, MN, “Running the essay Numbers: Portraits of critics thesis, Mass Consumption” International Museum of Art and Science, McAllen, TX “Chris Jordan: Running the Numbers” Sordoni Art Gallery, Wilkes University, Wilkes-Barre, PA “Running the Numbers: Portraits of application, Mass Consumption” Diemar/Noble Photography, London, UK, “Ushirikiano”, Photographs from the critics sapir-whorf thesis Prix Pictet Commission trip to application essay Kenya. Other Gallery, Shanghai, China “E Pluribus Unum”

Southern Methodist University, Hunt Institute for critics sapir-whorf thesis Engineering and english papers ks3, Humanity, Dallas, TX “Running the Numbers: Portraits of critics of the, Mass Consumption” Nevada Museum of Art, Reno, NV “Chris Jordan: Running the english Numbers” Other Gallery, Beijing, China “E Pluribus Unum” University of Colorado Museum of critics sapir-whorf, Natural History, Boulder, CO “Running the pitt Numbers: Portraits of critics thesis, Mass Consumption” Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, University of on personal, Oregon, Eugene “Chris Jordan: Running the Numbers” David Brower Center, Berkeley, CA “Chris Jordan: Running the sapir-whorf thesis Numbers” Simon Fraser University Gallery, Burnaby, BC, Canada “Running the Numbers”

Halsey Institute, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC “Chris Jordan: Running the service Numbers” Seymour Marine Discovery Center, UC Santa Cruz, CA “Running the Numbers: Portraits of critics of the sapir-whorf, Mass Consumption” Austin Museum of Art, Austin TX “Chris Jordan: Running the edinburgh dissertation archive Numbers” Cantor Fitzgerald Gallery, Haverford College, Haverford, PA “Chris Jordan: Running the critics sapir-whorf thesis Numbers” Museum of Science, Boston, MA “Running the english papers Numbers: Portraits of Mass Consumption” Pacific Science Center, Seattle, WA “Chris Jordan: Running the Numbers” Kopeikin Gallery, Los Angeles, “Running the critics sapir-whorf Numbers II” Santa Barbara Museum of research paper, Natural History, Santa Barbara, CA “Chris Jordan: Running the critics sapir-whorf Numbers” Winsor Gallery, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

Alcatel Lucent Headquarters, Paris, France. APEX: Chris Jordan, Portland Art Museum. Washington State University Art Museum, Pullman, WA, “Chris Jordan: Running the Numbers” San Antonio Public Library and Southwest School of Art and Craft, San Antonio, TX. Allen Memorial Art Museum, Oberlin College, Oberlin, OH. Handwerker Gallery, Ithaca College, Ithaca, NY.

Winsor Gallery, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Union Art Gallery, University of essay on personal statement, Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Paul Kopeikin Gallery, Los Angeles, “Running the Numbers” Von Lintel Gallery, New York. Armory Center for of the sapir-whorf the Arts, Pasadena, CA. Lannan Foundation Gallery, Santa Fe, NM. Paul Kopeikin Gallery, Los Angeles, “In Katrina’s Wake” Museo Circulo de Bellas Artes, Photo España Festival, Madrid, Spain. FotoPhoto Festival, Cesano Maderno, Italy.

Paul Kopeikin Gallery, Los Angeles, “Intolerable Beauty” Yossi Milo Gallery, New York. Photographic Center Northwest, Seattle WA. Clotworthy Arts Centre, Antrim, Ireland. Ryerson Image Centre, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON, Canada “The Edge of the research paper Earth: Climate Change in thesis, Photography and on personal statement, Video,” selections from Midway: Message from the of the sapir-whorf Gyre (September 14 - December 4, 2016) Appleton Museum of Art, Ocala, FL “Survival Architecture,” selections from In Katrina’s Wake: Portraits of an application essay Unnatural Disaster (September - November 2016) Honolulu Museum of thesis, Art, Honolulu, Hawaii, “Plastic Fantastic?” selections from the essay statement series Midway: Message from the Gyre (February 3, 2016 - July 10, 2016) FotoFest 2016 Biennial, Houston, TX “Changing Circumstances: Looking at sapir-whorf thesis, the Future of the edinburgh dissertation archive Planet” selections from Midway: Message from the of the Gyre (March 2016) KYOTOGRAPHIE International Photography Festival, Kyoto, Japan, selections from the research paper series Midway: Message from the critics of the thesis Gyre (April 23 - May 22, 2016) ZKM Karlsruhe, Karlsruhe, Germany “Globale - Exo-Evolution,” selections from the edinburgh dissertation archive series Midway: Message from the Gyre (October 30, 2015 - February 28, 2016) Peabody Essex Museum (PEM), Salem, MA, “Sizing It Up: Scale in critics sapir-whorf, Nature and Art” (October 10, 2015 - September 18, 2016)

Lianzhou International Foto Festival, Lianzhou, China, selections from the statement series Midway: Message from the Gyre (November 21 - December 10, 2015) Peabody Essex Museum (PEM), Salem, MA “Sizing It Up: Scale in Nature and Art” (October 10, 2015 - September 18, 2016) Venice Biennale, Official Azerbaijan Pavilion, “Vita Vitale” VERVE Gallery of Photography, Santa Fe, NM “Cause Effect” MuBE, Sao Paulo, Brazil, 2015 (selections from Midway: Message from the Gyre ) McMichael Canadian Art Collection, Vaughn, Ontario “Vanishing Ice: Alpine and sapir-whorf thesis, Polar Landscapes in Art, 1775-2012” (Denali Denial, 2006) Fundacion Telefonica, Madrid, Spain, “BIG BANG DATA” (Prison Uniforms, 2007) Centre de Cultura Contemporania de Barcelona (CCCB), Barcelona, Spain, “BIG BANG DATA” (Prison Uniforms, 2007) Glenbow Museum, Calgary, Alberta “Vanishing Ice: Alpine and research paper, Polar Landscapes in critics, Art, 1775-2012” (Denali Denial, 2006) Location House, London, UK “HERE TODAY. ”, in university, support of the IUCN 50th Anniversary of the critics sapir-whorf thesis Red List of Threatened Species (Silent Spring, 2014)

El Paso Museum of university dissertation archive, Art, El Paso, TX, “Vanishing Ice: Alpine and thesis, Polar Landscapes in essay, Art, 1775-2012” (Denali Denial, 2006) The Projective Eye Gallery, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, NC “Sustain Me Baby” (selections from Midway: Message from the Gyre) IABR, Kuntsthal, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, “Urban by Nature” (selections from Midway: Message from the critics of the thesis Gyre) University of Northern Iowa Gallery of Art, Iowa, “Nature’s Toolbox: Biodiversity, Art and research paper, Invention” (selections from Midway: Message from the Gyre) DePaul Art Museum, Chicago, IL, “Climate of sapir-whorf, Uncertainty” (selections from Midway: Message from the Gyre) Museo Nacional de la Fotografia, Bogota, Columbia, “Fotografica Bogota 2013 - International Photography Biennial” (selections from Intolerable Beauty) Bainbridge Island Museum of Art, Bainbridge, WA, “First Light” (Oil Barrels, 2008) Begovich Gallery, California State University, Fullerton, CA, “ego | eco: Environmental Art for Collective Consciousness” (selections from research paper Running the of the sapir-whorf thesis Numbers)

Whatcom Museum, Bellingham, WA, “Vanishing Ice: Alpine and application, Polar Landscapes in of the thesis, Art, 1775-2012” (Denali Denial, 2006) Herbert F. Johnson Museum of Art, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY (Cigarette Butts, 2013) George Adams Gallery, New York, NY “Seescape” (Gyre, 2009) The Leonardo, Salt Lake City, UT, “Nature’s Toolbox: Biodiversity, Art and paper writing service, Invention” (selections from Midway: Message from the Gyre) Ulrich Museum of of the, Art, Wichita, Kansas, “Nature’s Toolbox: Biodiversity, Art and Invention” (selections from essay Midway: Message from the critics sapir-whorf thesis Gyre) MOTI, Stichting Museum of the papers ks3 Image, The Netherlands, “The Image in the 21st Century” (selections from Midway: Message from the critics Gyre) The Field Museum, Chicago, IL, “Nature’s Toolbox: Biodiversity, Art and buy research paper service, Invention” Anchorage Museum, Anchorage, AK, “True North”

Hong Kong Convention and critics sapir-whorf, Exhibition Center, Hong Kong, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. Nesrin Esirtgen Collection, Istanbul, Turkey, “No. 1” Ayyam Gallery, Beirut, Lebanon, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. The Empty Quarter Gallery, Dubai, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition.

Dublin Museum of ks3, Photography, Ireland, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. Museum of Photographic Arts, San Diego, CA, “Infinite Balance: Artists the critics of the Environment” St. Statement. Louis Artist’s Guild, Clayton, MO “Running the of the thesis Numbers: Photographs by Chris Jordan” Corcoran Gallery of Art, Washington, DC, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. Real Jardin Botanico, Madrid, Spain, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. Roundhouse Mews, Vancouver, Canada, “The Ocean in Us”, Safe Planet Exhibit. Nevada Museum of buy research writing service, Art, Reno, NV, “The Altered Landscape: Photographs of a Changing Environment” Arteversum, Dusseldorf, Germany, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. Henry Art Gallery, Seattle, WA, “The Digital Eye: Photographic Art in critics thesis, the Electronic Age”

Galleria Carla Sozzani, Milan, Italy, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. North Carolina Museum of shy person essay, Art, Raleigh, “Landscape Sublime” Museum of Monterey, Monterey, CA, “Flows to Bay: Consumerism, Plastics the Ocean” Galerie Christophe Guye, Zurich, Switzerland, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. Thessaloniki Museum of sapir-whorf thesis, Photography, Greece, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition. University of Hawaii, Manoa, Honolulu, “Plastic Pollution”, Safe Planet Exhibit. Electric Works, San Francisco “In the pitt university application essay Eye of the Whale” Bryant Austin. Passage de Retz, Paris, France, Prix Pictet Growth Shortlist Exhibition.

Washington State Convention Center, Seattle, WA “Forecast: Communicating Weather and critics of the thesis, Climate” Boise Art Museum, Idaho “Critical Messages: Contemporary Northwest Artists on the Environment” San Jose Museum of Art, “Degrees of Separation: Contemporary Photography from the papers Permanent Collection” Universidad Technologico de Cancun, Cancun, Mexico, “What Will Be”, Safe Planet Exhibit at the United Nations Framework Convention on critics of the sapir-whorf thesis Climate Change. Galerie Filles du Calvaire, Paris, France, Prix Pictet 2010 Shortlist Preview Exhibition. BREDAPHOTO, International Photo Festival, Netherlands. Urban Institute for english papers Contemporary Arts, Grand Rapids, MI, ArtPrize Event. Hallie Ford Museum of Art, Willamette University, “Critical Messages: Contemporary Northwest Artists on the Environment” ARS Electronica Center, Linz, Austria, “Raise Your Voice” Exit Art, New York, “ECOAESTHETIC: The Tragedy of critics thesis, Beauty”

PRAE, Valladolid, Spain, “Rummaging in pitt university application, the Rubbish: Waste and critics of the sapir-whorf thesis, Recycling in Contemporary Art” Bohemian National Hall, New York City, “Substantialis Corporis Mixti”, Safe Planet Exhibit. Western Gallery, Western Washington University, “Critical Messages: Contemporary Northwest Artists on the Environmental” CDAN (Center of english papers, Art and Nature), Huesca, “Rummaging in the Rubbish: Waste and critics of the, Recycling in Contemporary Art” California State University Fullerton Main Art Gallery, “What’s the english papers ks3 Rush? Topics on Convenience” Koldo Mitxelena Cultural Centre, San Sebastian, “Rummaging in the Rubbish: Waste and of the sapir-whorf, Recycling in Contemporary Art” Brussels, “It is research paper, Our Earth” The Mariners Museum, Newport News, VA, “Message in a Bottle”

Gualala Arts Center, Gualala, CA, “Paper nOr Plastic” Prix Pictet 2008 Shortlisted Artists Exhibition - Selection, Sustainability-Congress, Bonn. Prix Pictet 2008 Shortlisted Artists Exhibition, Eindhoven University of critics of the thesis, Technology, Eindhoven. Prix Pictet 2008 Shortlisted Artists Exhibition - Selection, Kempinski Hotel, Dresden. Prix Pictet 2008 Shortlisted Artists Exhibition - Selection, The Rotunda, Exchange Square, Central, Hong Kong. Pasadena Museum of California Art, “Data + Art: Science and shy person essay, Art in the Age of Information” Prix Pictet 2008 Shortlisted Artists Exhibition - Selection, The Intelligence Squared Green Festival, Royal Geographical Society, London. Prix Pictet 2008, Shortlisted Artists Exhibition, Thessaloniki Museum of of the thesis, Photograph, Thessaloniki. Prix Pictet 2008, Shortlisted Artists Exhibition - Selection, DIFC, Dubai. Prix Pictet 2008, Shortlisted Artists Exhibition, Palais de Tokyo, Paris.

Austin Museum of buy research, Art, Austin TX; “Modern Art. Sapir-whorf. Modern Lives. Pitt University Application. Then + Now” Price Tower Arts Center, Bartlesville, OK, “3-logy Triennial 2008: Imaginative Qualities of Actual Things” Affirmation Arts, New York, NY, “Garbage Picker”

Mesa Arts Center, Mesa, AZ, “Mass Consumption” Mountainfilm, Telluride, CO. Deutsche Bank Gallery, New York, NY, “Feeling the Heat: Art, Science and of the thesis, Climate Change” Field Museum, Chicago, “Melting Ice/A Hot Topic,” curator Randy Rosenberg. FotoGraphia Festival Internazionale di Roma, Rome, Italy.

Sharon Arts Center, Peterborough, NH “WASTE: Artists Speak Out on our Disposable Culture” Ministry of Culture, Monaco, “Melting Ice/A Hot Topic” Montpelier Arts Center, Laurel, MD “Digital Sequences” Montserrat College of essay on personal, Art, Beverly, MA “Cornucopia: Documenting the thesis Land of essay on personal statement, Plenty BOZAR Centre for critics thesis Fine Arts, Brussels, Belgium, “Melting Ice/A Hot Topic Boulder Museum of essay statement, Contemporary Art, Colorado, “Weather Report”

Helen Day Art Center, Stowe, VT “Nature Remains: The Artist as Environmentalist” Bates College Museum of Art, “Green Horizons” Nobel Peace Center, Oslo, Norway. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf. “Envisioning Change” Natural World Museum, San Francisco, “Environmental Renaissance” North Carolina Museum of Art, “The Big Picture”

Tufts University Art Gallery, Massachusets, “Altered States, Views of Transition in Recent Photography” Texas State University Art Gallery, “Loyal Opposition” TED Conference, Monterey, CA. International Photomedia Biennial, Society for essay on personal Contemporary Photography, Kansas City MO (Fellowship Award recipient) Wesleyan University, Ezra and Cecile Zilkha Gallery, Connecticut. Lawrimore Project, Seattle.

Gail Gibson Gallery, Seattle. Houston Center for Photography, “Trace, Visions of Katrina” New Orleans Museum of critics thesis, Art. Port Angeles Fine Arts Center, Port Angeles, WA. “Art Not Oil,” London, traveling exhibition. Museum of Cultural Arts Houston, Houston, TX, “Artists Responding to research paper Violence Against the Earth” (Best of of the sapir-whorf thesis, Show award)

College of university dissertation archive, Santa Fe Art Gallery, Santa Fe, NM. 4th Annual Recycled Art Show, Seattle, WA. Urban Jungle Environmental Expo, U.N. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf. International Environment Day, San Francisco, CA. Allegany Arts Council Wills Creek Survey, juried by buy research paper Elizabeth Thomas, Carnegie Museum of of the, Art. Agora Gallery SoHo/Chelsea International Fine Art Competition, juried by Susan Cross, Guggenheim Museum, New York.

International Fine Art Photography Exhibition, Center for research paper Fine Art Photography, Ft Collins, CO. Photo España Descubrimientos 04, Madrid, Spain. Artivist Film Festival, Los Angeles CA. “Intimate Landscapes,” Tacoma Art Museum, Tacoma, WA. Photographic Image Gallery, Portland, OR.

Earth Day, Eastshore Gallery, Bellevue, WA. The Third Annual Earth Day Invitational Exhibit, Seattle, WA. The Second Annual Earth Day Invitational Exhibit, Seattle, WA. The First Annual Earth Day Invitational Exhibit, Seattle, WA. “Visions of critics, Grace” juried by research paper Jock Sturges, Seattle, WA. Northwest Annual, Bellevue Art Museum, Bellevue, WA. “The Search for Transcendence” juried by Joyce Tenneson, Seattle, WA. “Worth A Thousand Words” juried by Duane Michals, Seattle, WA.

Los Angeles County Museum of critics of the sapir-whorf, Art (LACMA) Museum of Fine Arts, Houston. Santa Barbara Museum of Art. San Jose Museum of essay on personal, Art. Birmingham Museum of Art. Austin Museum of critics sapir-whorf, Art. Boise Art Museum. Nevada Museum of Art. North Carolina Museum of Art.

Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art. Erica Tishman Collection. Michael Wilson Collection. Allen G. Thomas Jr. Collection. Bruce Berman Collection. Human Security Award from the shy person Center of critics of the sapir-whorf, Unconventional Security Affairs, UC Irvine. Trailblazer, Sustainable Path Foundation, Seattle, WA.

Artist Trust Fellowship for essay Media, Seattle, WA. Design Futures Council Senior Fellow. Prix Pictet, London, UK, Commission Prize. Aaron Siskind Foundation Individual Photographer Fellowship. Prix Pictet, London, UK, Nominated Short Listed Artist. Ansel Adams Award for of the sapir-whorf Excellence in edinburgh university archive, Conservation Photography, Sierra Club. LEAD Award, Germany, For “Midway” series published in sapir-whorf thesis, Stern Magazine, Bronze Medal. TreeHugger, Best of edinburgh university dissertation, Green, Best Artist. Prix Pictet, London, UK, Nominated Shortlisted Artist. Green Leaf Award, Natural World Museum and critics of the, United Nations Environment Programme, Nobel Peace Center, Oslo, Norway.

Fellowship Award recipient, Society for Contemporary Photography, Kansas City, MO. Best of Show award, “Artists Responding to edinburgh archive Violence Against the Earth,” Museum of Cultural Arts, Houston, TX. Finalist, Santa Fe Prize for of the sapir-whorf Photography. First Place Winner, Gary Horowitz Award, Allegany Arts Council. Photo España Descubrimientos, Honorable Mention runner up to edinburgh university archive festival prize, Madrid, Spain. Finalist, Honickman First Book Prize in Photography, Center for of the thesis Documentary Studies. Volume Magazine, Netherlands, Summer Issue #31. Sixth Finch, Summer Issue. Deep Sleep, Terminal Issue, Issue 6.

Sierra Magazine, January/February Issue. Financial Times Weekend Magazine, November 13/14. Image Magazine, Finland, November. Sea Voices, by research paper Duffy and Elizabeth Laul Healey. Denison Magazine, Granville, Ohio, Winter Issue. The Photo Review, Langhorne, PA, Volume 29, Number 1. Focus Magazine, Poland, October.

Solar Today, Canada, September/October. Le Monde Magazine, France, September 18. Ms.Use Magazine, Tel Aviv, August. Discover Magazine, NY, July/August. Telerama, France, July 23. Yes! Magazine, “Bearing Witness: Chris Jordan on sapir-whorf Art, Grief, and Transformation,” April 14. Colors Magazine, Italy, Spring issue. Foam Magazine, Spring issue.

The Chronicle Review, March 26. Focus, Poland, February issue. Mother Jones, January/February issue. Photolife, “Chris Jordan: A Soul Searching Photographer,” January, Volume 35, Number 1. Omega Lifetime, “What a Waste” January, Issue 5. Courrier, Japan, January. Adformatie, Netherlands, January 7. Yuno Magazine, Germany, January. Alternatives, Canada, Volume 36, Number 1. Ecotone, UNCW, “ReImagining Place” Picnic Magazine, Mexico, Number 29.

The Colourist, United Kingdom, Issue 4. Photo District News, Photo of the paper writing Day, December 21. Esquire, Russia, December issue. NRC Weekblad, Netherlands, November/December issue. The New York Review of Books, November 19. Stern Magazine, Germany, November 12. PLANET Magazine, Nov. 5. International,Nov. 4. The Huffington Post, Nov. Critics Of The. 2. VSD, France, November. kosmos journal, Fall/Winter issue. Planet Green, October 19. artdish, Review of research paper, Pacific Science Center Exhibit, October 16.

The Seattle Times, Review of Pacific Science Center Exhibit, October 9. The PhotoBook, October 4. The PhotoBook, August 29. New York Times Dot Earth, August 19. Wend Magazine, July 29. Matador Change, July 15. Pitch, The Mountainfilm Magazine, July. Resurgence, UK, July/August Issue. Daily Press, press for of the thesis “Message in a Bottle” exhibit, June 14. La Tribune et Moi, France, June 13. emel magazine, UK, June issue.

Swerve, Calgary, June 5. Consumer Reports, May 20. Garden 91, Taiwan, May 5. EXIT Magazine Imagen Cultura, Madrid, Spain, Issue Number 34, May/June/July. Mother Jones Magazine, May/June Issue. Innovation Magazine, Spring Issue. ArtWorks Magazine, Spring Issue. The Seattle Times, Pacific Northwest Sunday Magazine, April 19.

The Stranger, April 14. “Recession Inspires Expansion” April 12. data visualization, April 6. Horses Think, “Pulse,” March 10. A Sky filled with Shooting Stars, “The Pick of Pulse,” March 6.

NewScientist, February 3. Entertainment Weekly, Jan.30/Feb.6 Issue. Vrij Nederland, January Issue. Sun Valley Guide, Habitat. Terra Economica, December issue. Orion Magazine, Nov./Dec. Papers. Issue.

Greensource Magazine, Nov./Dec. Issue. Arcade Magazine, Winter Issue. GEO magazine, Germany, October issue. Revista Criativa, Brazil, Issue 234, October.

The AkzoNobel Magazine, Issue 1, October. Architecture Boston, Sept./Oct. Issue. Vogue Italy, September. San Francisco Chronicle, September 27. Le Monde 2, September 20. Popular Photography, September issue. iidea creativity design magazine, Beijing, China, August issue.

Vogue Brazil, Issue 360, August. SOL Magazine, Lisbon, Portugal, Aug 27. Financial Times Weekend Magazine, Prix Pictet Shortlist, July 12/13. Art In America, June/July issue (exhibition review by Suzaan Boettger) Le Monde 2, June issue. iidea creativity design magazine, Beijing, China, June issue. Delicious Living Magazine, Boulder, CO, June Issue. Adbusters Magazine, Vancouver, BC, May/June Issue.

Harper’s Magazine, USA, May issue. Sotokoto Magazine, Japan, April Issue. L’Uomo Vogue, Italy, April Issue. Cleveland Plain Dealer, Cleveland, OH, April 27. La Repubblicca, Rome, Italy, April 24. Destak Lisboa, Lisbon Portugal, p. 32, April 22. Il Manifesto, Rome, Italy, p. Critics Of The. 14, April 22. Keng Sheng Daily News, Taipei, Taiwan, April 21. Metro Portugal, Lisbon, April 16, Edicao Especial. Mundo Universit·rio, Lisbon Portugal, p. 14, April 21.

Sabado Magazine, Lisbon Portugal, p. On Personal. 143, April 17. Yes! Magazine, April 14. Taipei Times Sunday Edition, Tapei, Taiwan, April 13. China Times Newspaper, Taipei, Taiwan, April 12. Yvi Magazine, The Netherlands, Issue #2: Consumption. Ivy Magazine, Hamburg, Germany. Rotman Magazine, Toronto, Spring Issue.

Cool Magazine, New York, Spring Issue, Vol. 15. STILUS Magazin, Budapest, Hungary, March issue. Conscious Choice, Seattle, March Issue. Esquire Magazine, China edition, March Issue.

Outside Magazine, USA, March issue. Conscious Choice Magazine, Seattle, March issue. Upstreet Magazine, France, March Issue. St. Critics. Louis Post-Dispatch, March 30. Globe and Mail, Winsor Gallery exhibition review, Canada, February 27.

The Vancouver Sun, Winsor Gallery Exhibition Review, February 9. The Vancouver Courier, Winsor Gallery exhibition review, February 8. BMW Magazine, February issue. Men’s Journal Magazine, USA, February Issue. Icon Magazine, Essex, England, Issue 56, February. Focus Junior Magazine, Hamburg, Italian edition. Digitalis Foto Magazin, Budapest, Hungary, Jan/Feb issue.

Greenpeace Magazine, Germany, January/February Issue. iidea creativity design magazine, Beijing, China, January Issue. Esquire Magazine, Spain, January Issue. Inhabitat, New York, January 30. Washington Post, exhibition review, January 29. Conde Nast Portfolio, New York, January Issue. Art In Action: Nature, Creativity, and service, Our Collective Future, pp.

54-55, Natural World Museum. Ukula Magazine, Toronto, Vol. 3 No. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. 3. Coutts Bank Journal, London, Issue 2. Superinteressante Magazine, Sao Paulo, Brazil, Edicao 247, December issue. Adbusters, Vancouver, BC, Issue 74, Nov./Dec. Third Coast Digest, November 28. Ventiquattro Magazine, Italy, November Issue. Esquire Magazine, Russia, October Issue.

LA Times, review of university essay, exhibit at Paul Kopeikin gallery, October 5. Elephant, Autumn issue, No. 21. Pulse, Hofstra University’s Student Magazine, Fall, Issue 12. Denver Post, “Weather Report” critique, September 21. Art Culture, “Seeing Numbers in a Whole New Way,” September 18. Current TV, San Francisco, September 13th.

IEEE Spectrum Magazine, New York, September Issue. Utne Reader, USA, Sept./Oct. issue. IdN Magazine, Hong Kong, August/September Issue. Internazionale Magazine, Italy, August 23. The Toronto Star, August 5. Vision Magazine, China, August Issue. World Ark Magazine, Arkansas, July/August Issue. The Morning News, July 23. Trend Magazine, Santa Fe, Summer Issue. Frog Design Mind, San Francisco, Summer Issue.

Daily Press, Newport News, Virginia, June 25, July 2, July 16. Brasil Sustentavel Magazine, Brazil, May/June Issue. Milk Magazine, Hong Kong, May 24. Masa Acher Magazine, Israel, Issue 190. Visual Communication Quarterly, Special Issue: Hurricane Katrina, Spring issue, Volume 14 Number 2. Plazm Magazine, Portland, OR, Issue #28.

Five Magazine, Issue 17. Trece:Veinte Magazine, Mexico. Vanity Fair, Italy. AFISHA Magazine, Russia. Oyster Magazine, Australia, Issue 72. Magazine Esta, The Netherlands. Brand Eins Wirtschaftsmagazin, Hamburg, Germany, July issue.

Geo Magazine, Germany, July Issue. BH Magazino, Greece, June issue. LifeLounge Magazine, Victoria, Australia, Summer issue. Magenta Magazine, Toronto, Vol 2, issue 2 (June). Contagious Magazine, London, June issue. Revista MTV, Brasil, June issue. BANT Magazine, Istanbul, Turkey, June issue. Lodown Magazine, Berlin, Germany, May/June issue. World Watch, Volume 20, Number 2, March/April. Orion Magazine, USA, March/April issue. Shambhala Sun, March issue.

FUTU Magazine, Warsaw, Poland, spring issue. sleek mag, Magazine of of the sapir-whorf, Art and pitt university application, Fashion, Berlin, Germany, winter issue. FlashFilm Magazine, Japan. NewConsumer Magazine, Edinburgh, Scotland, Jan/Feb issue. “One Shot 2006,” published by Visual Codec, USA. Callaloo Literary Journal, Texas AM University, USA, Volume 29, Number 4. PhotoEspaña: Naturaleza, Madrid, Spain. ELLE Magazine, Italy, December issue. San Francisco Chronicle, review of “In Katrina’s Wake,” Nov 19th. Pasatiempo, Santa Fe, New Mexico, Nov. Issue.

EXIT Magazine Imagen Cultura, Madrid Spain, Issue Number 24. Lo Specchio Magazine, Italy, October 14th issue. Los Angeles Times, review of show at Paul Kopeikin Gallery, October 6. PHOTO Magazine, Romania, October issue. Focus Magazine, Warsaw, Poland, October issue. World Watch Magazine, WorldWatch Institute, September/October issue. Seattle Times, show review by critics sapir-whorf Matthew Kangas, September 15. Que Onda Magazine, Dallas/Ft.

Worth, August/September issue. Los Angeles Times, August 27. Atlanta Latino, August 24-30. Associated Press, review of research paper, “In Katrina’s Wake,” syndicated in critics of the sapir-whorf, newspapers nationally, August. Rolling Stone Magazine, Spain, June issue. Pending Magazine, Switzerland, May issue. Photographie, May Issue. Profile Magazine, London, April issue.

Quest Magazine, Germany, March issue. Grist Magazine, USA, March issue. KIJK Magazine, The Netherlands, March issue. Sunday Star-Ledger, Perspective Section, February 26. Harper’s Magazine, USA, February issue. ART Magazine, Germany, February issue. Mental Contagion, Issue #65, February. “C” International Photography Magazine, London, January issue. Focus Magazine, Greece, January issue. Scrap Magazine, Wash.

D.C., November/December Issue, Vol. 62. Lufthansa, Germany, Nov. Issue. Digital Journalist, “QA with Photographer Chris Jordan,” November. Focus Magazine, Italy, October issue. Seattle Times, “Making the papers ks3 Most of of the sapir-whorf thesis, Things,” October 7. The Stranger, Seattle, Sep. 29. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Review of shy person essay, PCNW show, September 23. London Daily Telegraph, “In Focus,” September 4.

FotoPhoto, Italy, Sept. - Nov. Of The Sapir-whorf Thesis. Issue. Art In America Magazine, Chris Jordan at Paul Kopeikin , September issue. In Balance, New American Dream, Fall issue, No. Research Paper. 33. Tacoma News Tribune, In the critics Land of Plenty , August 21. South China Morning Post, The Ring Recycle? More Like The Hard Sell For a Load of ks3, Rubbish , August 7. Smithsonian Magazine, E-Gad! , by critics Elizabeth Royte; also run as a feature on essay CNN, August 7. New York Times Chris Jordan’s Great Big Beautiful Piles of critics sapir-whorf, Junk , by edinburgh dissertation archive Philip Gefter, July 24. PhotoMedia Magazine, Beauty and of the sapir-whorf thesis, the Blight , portfolio feature, Fall issue, 2004.

Pacific Northwest Magazine, Shooting From the university Soul , March 21, 2004. Seattle Times, Throwaway Culture In Focus , also in critics sapir-whorf, Dallas Morning News, San Antonio Express News Tampa Tribune, February 15, 2004. View Camera Magazine, Chris Jordan the Miracle of the Mundane , July/August issue, 2003. Seattle Post-Intelligencer, Night Blooming: Chris Jordan’s Camera Captures Dazzling Urban Trees , by university dissertation Regina Hackett, June 16, 2001. Amarillo Museum of critics sapir-whorf thesis, Art, Amarillo TX - October 23, 2015. Maryland Institute College of Arts (MICA), Baltimore MD - September 28, 2015. International Symposium on research paper Society and critics of the thesis, Resource Management (ISSRM), College of dissertation, Charleston, Charleston SC - June 14, 2015. Society for Photographic Education, 52nd National Conference, New Orleans, LA - March 2015.

DePauw University, Greencastle, IN - March 2015. King Abdullah University of critics sapir-whorf thesis, Science and writing, Technology (KAUST), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia - October 20-22, 2014. Arts Week, St. George’s School, Vancouver, BC - April 7-11, 2014. World Water Week, Chief Sealth High School, Seattle, WA - March 25, 2014. Sustainable Living Festival, Melbourne, Australia - February 10-17, 2014. Marine plastic pollution conference, Oslo, Norway - February 4, 2014. Department of Geography, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI - November 19, 2013. Duke Arts Festival, Duke University, Durham, NC - October 30, 2013. Sightline Institute 20th Anniversary, Seattle, WA - June 19, 2013. Center for Unconventional Security Affairs 9th Annual Human Security Award, University of critics of the thesis, California Irvine, Irvine, Ca - April 24, 2013.

Contemporary Perspectives Lecture Series, Boston University School of essay, Visual Arts, Boston, MA - April 18, 2013. Wohlsen Center for critics thesis the Sustainable Environment, Franklin Marshall College, Lancaster, PA - April 15, 2013. Research Recognition Dinner, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL - April 11, 2013. Pacifica Graduate Institute, Carpinteria, CA - April 9, 2013. Across the Threshold: Creativity, Being and Healing Conference, Duke University, Durham, NC - February 28, 2013. The Center High School, Community Meeting, Seattle, WA - February 13, 2013.

Global Alliance for shy person essay Transformational Entertainment, GATE 3 Story Conference, Los Angeles, CA - February 2, 2013. Students for Sustainability Conference, Alexandria, VA - November 13 , 2012. Penny W Stamps Speaker Series, University of of the, Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI - November 15, 2012. Smithsonian Symposium, Smithsonian National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC - October 11, 2012. The Sixteenth Annual Otis Lecture supported by The Philip J. Edinburgh Dissertation Archive. Otis Endowment, Bates College, Lewiston, ME - October 9, 2012. Meredith College, Raleigh, NC - September 19, 2012. Museum of Photographic Arts, San Diego, CA - November 17. TEDxRainier, University of Washington, Seattle, WA - November 12. News Xchange Conference, Cascais, Portugal - November 4. Core Club, New York - October 25.

Microsoft Art Collection Artist Lecture Series, Redmond, WA - October 7. Art + Environment Conference, Nevada Museum of critics thesis, Art, Reno, NV - September 30. International Museum of Art and edinburgh, Science, McAllen, TX - September 3. Central Academy of Fine Arts, Beijing, China - April 15. Jordan Schnitzer Museum of Art, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR - January 26. TEDx: Great Pacific Garbage Patch, Los Angeles, CA - November 6. College of Charleston, Charleston, SC (Exhibit lecture) - October 22.

Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC - October 20. Whitworth University, Spokane, WA - October 12. National Center on critics of the Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO - October 5. David Brower Center, Berkeley, CA - September 30. International Bridge, Tunnel Turnpike Association, San Diego, CA - September 14. DLR Group, Seattle, WA - August 3rd. American College Personnel Association, Seattle, WA - June 25.

American Institute of essay, Architects, Miami Beach, FL - June 11. Austin Museum of critics sapir-whorf thesis, Art, Austin, TX (Exhibit lecture) - June 3. MountainFilm Festival, Telluride, CO - May 30. Museum of Science, Boston, MA - April 30. Phillips Collection, Washington, DC - April 28. Sietar Conference, Spokane, WA - April 17.

NYU Reynold’s Program, NYC - Mar. English Papers Ks3. 3. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC - Mar. Critics Of The Thesis. 2. Park School of Baltimore, Baltimore, MD - Mar. English Ks3. 1. American Dental Education Association, National Harbor, MD - Feb. Critics Thesis. 28. Haverford College, Haverford, PA - Jan. Essay On Personal Statement. 28. State of the critics sapir-whorf World Symposium, Washington DC - Jan.

21. Journalism that Matters Pacific Northwest Conference, Seattle, WA - Jan. Buy Research Paper. 8. Wisconsin Women’s Business Intiative Corporation, Milwaukee, WI - Nov. Critics Sapir-whorf Thesis. 18. Kids4Kids Conference, Port Sorell, Australia - Nov. 13. Tasmanian Arts School, Hobart, Australia - Nov. 12.

Australian Antarctic Division, Hobart, Australia - Nov. English Ks3. 12. Kids4Kids Conference, Hobart, Australia - Nov. 11. University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia - Nov. 10. Opportunity Green, LA, CA - Nov. 7. Southern California Edison, CA - Nov.

5. American Association of Colleges of Nursing, Washington DC - Nov. 1. PopTech Camden, ME - Oct. Critics. 22-Oct. University Application Essay. 24. Thomas S. Sapir-whorf Thesis. Kenan Institute for shy person the Arts, North Carolina - Oct. 13.

Pacific Science Center, Seattle, WA - Oct. 1, Oct. 3. MountainFilm Festival, Aspen, CO - Aug. 29-Aug. 30. Green Forum: Oceans, Miami, FL - Aug. Of The. 27.

Arizona Commission on the Arts, State of Arizona, Carefree, Arizona - Aug. Edinburgh University Dissertation Archive. 18. Shoreline Solar Project, Seattle - July 17. Western Bridge Gallery - Seattle Green Bag Campaign, Seattle, WA - June 29. Portland State University, Portland, OR - April 30. Mattel, Inc., California - April 23. American Society for thesis Quality, Milwaukee, WI - April 21-April 22. Cornish College - Class lecture, Seattle - April 16. Ideas Festival 2009, Queensland, Australia - Mar. 27.

Guiding Lights Weekend, Seattle, WA - Jan. 30. Steelcase, Inc., Santa Monica, CA - Jan. Shy Person. 29. SMU - Willis M. Tate Distinguished Lecture Programs, Dallas, TX - Jan. Critics. 27.

WSU Chris Jordan Exhibit opening, Pullman, WA - Jan. Research Paper. 22. Association of American Colleges and critics, Universities (AACU), Seattle, WA - Jan. 21. Sprint, Kansas City, MO (Keynote Speech) - Nov. 14.

Woodmont Library Talk, Seattle, WA - Nov. 13. Virginia Commonwealth University, Doha Qatar - Nov. Paper Writing. 10. World Economic Forum Council on Design, Dubai, United Arab Emirates - Nov. Critics Thesis. 7 - Nov. 9.

AHIMA Convention (American Health Information Management Association), Seattle, WA - Oct. 13. One Earth One dream symposium, Laguna Beach, CA - Oct. 1- Oct. 5. Images and Voices of Hope Summit, Catskill, NY - Sept. English Ks3. 26-Sept. Critics Sapir-whorf. 28. West Coast Green - Green Building Design, Innovation Business, San Jose, CA - Sept.

25. International Interior Design Association - SF Chapter Speaking Engagement, San Francisco, CA - Sept. 23. Greenway Consulting Group, Vancouver - Sept. Research Paper. 22. National Assembly of of the sapir-whorf, State Arts Agencies, Chattanooga, TN - Sept.

13. Utah League of Cities and paper, Towns - Salt Lake Sheraton, Salt Lake City, UT - Sept. 11. Mattel, Inc., Manhattan Beach, CA - Sept. 10. McKinley Financial Services c/o HR Florida, Orlanda, FL - Aug. Sapir-whorf. 26. Chromatic Films/Ovation TV crew, Seattle, WA - Aug. Pitt Essay. 22.

Texas Public Radio, San Antonio, TX - Aug. Critics Of The Thesis. 6. San Antonio Municipal Auditorium, San Antonio, TX - Aug. Application. 6. Hollyhock Conference, Cortes Island - Jult 26-July 31. DaVIta Retreat - Personal Growth Wellness Symposium, Santa Barbara, CA - July 8. Merrill Lynch, Coconut Grove, FL - June 24. NatureWorks Inc., Tokyo, Japan - June 1-June 7.

MountainFilm Festival, Telluride, CO - May 23-May 26. Government Invitational Lecture Tour, Caracas, Venezuala - May 12-May 18. National Geographic Eco Ambassador Tour - Taipei, Taiwan; Lisbon, Portugal; Rome, Italy - April 10-April 30. Interview with Annika from of the Art Threat Magazine - Mar. Research Paper. 26. Oberlin College, Allen Memorial Art Museum, Oberlin, OH - Mar. Critics Sapir-whorf. 12.

TED Conference, Monterey, CA - Feb. Research Paper. 26-Feb 29. National Building Museum, Washington DC - Dec. Critics Of The Sapir-whorf. 18. University of Wisconson - Milwaukee, Union Art Gallery, Milwaukee, WI - Nov. 16.

University of Wisconson - Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI - Nov. 14. Colbert Report, New York - Oct. 10. Boulder Museum of Contemporary Art, Boulder, CO - Oct. 3. University of on personal statement, Colorado, Boulder, CO (Visiting Artist lecture) - Oct. 2.

Center for a New American Dream retreat, Washington DC - Sept. Critics Sapir-whorf Thesis. 26. CJ NYC Opening at Von Lintel Gallery, New York - June 14. San Francisco Young Leaders Breakfast (Keynote) - April 26.